this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
158 points (98.2% liked)

News

23851 readers
3687 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Several states, including Alabama, Maryland, and New Hampshire, are introducing legislation to ban or restrict cellphones in schools.

The measures claim to reduce distractions and address concerns over teen mental health linked to heavy social media use.

Proponents argue such bans help students focus, but opponents, including parents, warn of safety and communication issues.

“If something were to happen in the school, my child should be able to have their cellphone to be able to call for help, to be able to call me,” said parent Jeara Underwood.

Experts emphasize teaching responsible tech use rather than imposing broad bans.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dmtalon@infosec.pub 49 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Right after they stop letting guns in there maybe

[–] credo@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There won’t be any mass shootings if kids can’t call to report them 🤷‍♂️

[–] ElcaineVolta@kbin.melroy.org 7 points 2 days ago

the "if we just stop testing, there won't be any more cases" approach to public health, what a pleasure it is to exist in america.

... there's already laws about that

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 38 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Experts emphasize teaching responsible tech use rather than imposing broad bans.

This. Discipline the student for having it out during an inappropriate time. Not punish the group. Is that so hard?

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

When school staffing has one teacher per forty or so students? Yeah.

That said, I still think these measures are stupid and punishing the group for society's failure to fund and staff our schools appropriately, but I can understand why teachers often support them.

[–] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I'd say yes. Teachers have very limited ways to deal with students. There's no harm in banning phones during school hours, in fact, you could argue that it's beneficial to the mental development of children to reduce phone times.

[–] MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I was talking to a teacher over the holidays, and apparently some kids will have one or more dummy phones (fauxns?) to hand over if asked when they try to sneak their real phone into class.

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

Fauxns is fantastic lol Yeah, I have several students that use that stunt.

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago

Since the days of flip phones, my friend

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 3 points 1 day ago

Was this bill sponsored by Texas Instruments?

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Shouldn't this be a school district issue why does a state government need to get involved?

[–] moshankey@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Have fun closing that little box.

[–] ggppjj@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Your comment almost launched me into the third tirade in as many months about how the story of "schools putting in litter boxes" was nothing but anti-education nonsense that doesn't take into account the fact that most school boards are made up of people who would never do anything like that in a million years just on cost alone, then I re-read lol.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

“If something were to happen in the school, my child should be able to have their cellphone to be able to call for help, to be able to call me,” said parent Jeara Underwood.

Exactly. My son keeps his phone on him, and I keep mine with me. I don’t care what the school or my workplace says, the phones stay with us. There was a hoax call to his school that said there was going to be a shooting. In the moment, we weren’t sure what was happening. Thankfully, it was a hoax, and he and I were able to keep in contact throughout.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Ok? This isn't banning having cell phones on you. It's banning their use. Obviously if something were to happen, that rule kind of goes out the window.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Weird that some parents are against this. I live in a country where we have a ban and grades have been going up, there's less problems in class, teachers are more relaxed again, kids have started playing again during recess and they are overall less chaotic.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Its almost like cell phones would be entirely negative if we didn't need them to navigate

[–] banshee@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Out of curiosity, I searched for China's approach and found that they banned children bringing phones to school without written parental consent. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-55902778

I'm still figuring out where I stand, but I'm not sure I disagree. School shooters have been linked to high social media use. I wonder if a ban could help at all in this regard.

On a side note, I don't really see how banning cell phones could be interpreted as punishment. If anything, it should help reduce apparent disparities and avoid punishment for inappropriate use

They should implement age verification for social media so people stop using it.

[–] boreengreen@lemm.ee -1 points 2 days ago

Build faraday cage in to classroom walls.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago

Hey it only took us a couple of decades!

Understanding media is going super well you guys.