Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Then go work for private sector.
He wants to be a welfare queen.
Oh the poor old things. Imagine not getting a raise since 2009!! All the minimum wage workers can imagine just that, because minimum wage hasn't been raised since 2009, either. And a full time minimum wage job is going to provide a helluva less income than $174K.
I'm so tired of these privileged blowhards griping and complaining about how hard they have it while actively refusing to actually improve the lives of their constituents.
Isn't Washington D.C. also one of the more expensive cities to live in?
So, yeah, residence at home, residence in D.C. Tough to swing on 174K.
What they should do is make everyone remote. Secure video connections from their homes.
This meeting of the 119th Congress is brought to you by SurfShark.
It's too dangerous to use outside software. They would need to hire a team to develop an in-house video solution... and it crashed again.
Looking forward to people zoom bombing congress.
That salary means something different to a congressman from the Bay area or NYC, vs. a congressman from Boise or Iowa. Im down for pay raises generally.
Never trust anyone over the age of five wearing a bow tie.
But The Doctor wore one!
True but this isn’t Gallifrey and the doctor isn’t a shit bag republican.
you have to also wear a fez... and also care about humanity.
They can literally print money freely via insider trading, which is why many of them are millionaires. “Don’t have wealth”??? k.
This crying for more taxpayer dollar handouts through one of their pet media rags garners no sympathy from me. Especially when many of them view their role as obstructionists who should prevent government from functioning entirely. It’s pathetic, they should fuck off to the geriatric ward if they don’t think the job pays enough.
Can't afford two houses on that salary. Boo hoo!
The man who voted AGAINST raising YOUR wage is now complaining HIS wage ISN'T enough!
This is the best summary I could come up with:
But consider that members of Congress generally have to maintain two residences — one in Washington, DC, and one in their home state — and that they haven't gotten a raise since 2009.
Rep. Patrick McHenry, a North Carolina Republican who served as the interim speaker of the House following Kevin McCarthy's ouster, told The Dispatch that congressional pay needed to be raised in order to attract "credible people to run for office."
"And then, you know, the very wealthy few end up dominating the news because of their personal stock trades when most of us don't have wealth."
McHenry, a more mild-mannered House Republican than most, recently announced he would retire from Congress at the end of his term.
As of now, many members of Congress are, in fact, independently wealthy, and many generate significant income from stock trading.
Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York has long pushed for a pay raise for members of Congress, arguing that it's a safeguard against corruption and makes lawmakers less likely to seek income through stock trading.
The original article contains 340 words, the summary contains 176 words. Saved 48%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Public servant wanting to get rich. Funny times.
What if we just pay them +10% on the existing bribe structure and convert to federally funded elections?