this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
107 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19308 readers
2726 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Bipartisan Senate Budget Committee investigation exposes how private equity firms prioritize profits over patients, jeopardizing care and eroding hospitals' financial health.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago

There is a legitimate reason for insurance companies to involve themselves in the healthcare market, and that is that many, if not most, patients don't have the cash available to pay for all of their necessary medical services. Healthcare services are expensive, for a lot of complex reasons, but one reason is that healthcare providers can be greedy, too. Many healthcare providers are also for-profit companies, and they want to maximize their profits as much as possible, also.

Enter health insurance, which spreads those costs over a large base of people, thus making healthcare services more affordable. Health insurance sucks, but without it, very few people would be able to afford anything other than relatively basic care. That is unless you happen to have tens, if not hundreds of thousands of dollars laying around.

So we have healthcare providers, equipment manufacturers and suppliers and pharmaceutical companies all trying to maximize their profits, and then health insurance companies as well, and it's a recipe for absolutely exploding healthcare prices.

The thing is, healthcare is always going to be relatively expensive. Doctors and nurses are skilled workers, who spend a lot of money getting an education, so they deserve to get paid. Medical equipment and supplies aren't necessarily cheap to make, neither are pharmaceuticals. Providing quality healthcare is just always going to have certain costs associated with it.

Profit, however, is not a necessary component to this. Adding to the price of all of these things to generate a surplus that goes to owners and investors is just unnecessary. So, profit should be eliminated from healthcare, full stop. No more for-profit hospitals, clinics, etc. That will help, but only so much. Even without owner/investor profit, healthcare would still be too expensive for many people. So, we absolutely need to spread those costs out, but not among the customers of many different private health insurance companies, but among the entire population of the nation.

Healthcare providers must be not-for-profit (but still regulated, because executives at not-for-profit companies can still be greedy assholes, and need to be kept in check), and there must be a single, national health insurance provider that everyone is required to pay into, through a progressive tax system.

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 6 points 10 hours ago

From the report, the two firms singled out for special scrutiny are:

  • Apollo-Owned Lifepoint Health and Ottumwa Regional Health Center (ORHC)

“ORHC’s private equity-owned operators failed to fulfill seven promises—including legally binding ones—made to ORHC when it was first acquired by a private equity-owned operator in 2010.”

  • Leonard Green & Partners (LGP) and Prospect Medical Holdings (PMH)

“Despite gross financial and operational mismanagement of its hospitals, LGP took home $424 million of the $645 million that PMH paid out in dividends and preferred stock redemption during LGP’s majority ownership—in addition to over $13 million in fees—that left PMH in severe financial distress.”

So the usual ‘commit murder but it doesn’t count because it was done by paperwork’.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 7 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

There's this old right-libertarian meme that goes something like this:

Me: I have apples
Friend: I would like to buy your apples
Government: We need to be part of this transaction

Somehow, they never connect insurance companies doing the same to healthcare.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Ninety-Five_Barrels_Alleged_Apple_Cider_Vinegar

That is one of the foundational cases that allowed the FDA to operate. Basically, the government gets involved when people lie about their apples lol

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 hours ago

They aren’t horning in to take an unearned slice! They are assuring quality! Somehow! /s

[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

I have yet to discover any way in which for profit investments in health care provide better results.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 2 points 12 hours ago

You don't say