this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
670 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

59578 readers
3053 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] yamanii@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Should've taken the L and paid the fine instead of buying it outright.

[–] PedroMaldonado@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Getting tired of this Special Man thing these jerkwads keep pushing. Elon went away tomorrow and the the next dude will slot right in.

[–] SpezCanLigmaBalls@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Musk fans punching the air

[–] Ltcpanic@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Could that have ever been the intent?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


One question is whether Fidelity sold any of its stake during November, but the latest drop in value isn't surprising given the recent Musk-related controversies that drove advertisers away from the platform.

"Assuming the fund hasn't reduced its holding in X, the latest report implies the value of the entire company has also fallen by 72 percent.

As Axios noted, "Fidelity doesn't necessarily have much, if any, inside information on X's financial performance, despite being a shareholder in the privately held business.

Musk's company sued California in September in an attempt to block the state's content-moderation law but last week lost a key ruling in the court case.

On Thursday, US District Judge William Shubb denied X's motion for a preliminary injunction that would have blocked enforcement of the California content-moderation law.

The state law requires companies to file two reports each year with terms of service and detailed descriptions of content-moderation practices.


The original article contains 554 words, the summary contains 153 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›