this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
77 points (89.7% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

55283 readers
368 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sp3ctre@feddit.org 80 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 54 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Longer answer: easily yes.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Huh. Based on the community this was posted in, I can assume that the answer the video comes to is "yes" and not watch it. But according to Betteridge's law of headlines the answer is "no." I need to argue about this without watching it but I don't know what stance to argue about.

Ah! I'll use the Orbit plugin to get an AI to summarize the video for me. Hm. The AI-generated summary says the video describes an anecdote about music copyright violations, talks about some ethical considerations about both music and software piracy, and then:

The speaker concludes by acknowledging the complexity of the issue and the importance of considering the perspectives of all parties involved.

So I guess the answer was "Maybe?" How am I supposed to have a pointless Internet argument about "Maybe?"

Bah. Someone attack me for using AI, at least that's a debate I can sink my teeth into.

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lazy prick! Should have just put the video on in the background while doing dishes, or do what I did and briefly skim the comments for someone to fight with! AI is dumb, it's not even named effectively and you're dumb for using it and a sheeple for calling it AI in the first place!
Fight me! ❤️

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 27 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Joke's on you, I have a dishwasher machine! Robots do my dishes for me too! It is you who is the dumb one, having to labor manually as you do!

Ah, there we go. Thanks.

[–] mogranja@lemmy.eco.br 6 points 1 week ago

Is this the online equivalent of fisticuffs?

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

No worries fam, I got you.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] mogranja@lemmy.eco.br 33 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I want the stuff, the stuff is there. I take it. The stuff is still there, nothing was lost, nothing was stolen.

[–] Celestus@lemm.ee 0 points 6 days ago (2 children)

You’re not stealing stuff, you’re stealing revenue. The missing revenue is what they care about. But they have plenty of that already, so they can get bent

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Trilobite@lemm.ee 32 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's always moral to steal from billionaires

[–] quirzle@lemmy.zip 41 points 1 week ago

I agree, but software piracy isn't stealing from anyone.

Stealing definitively requires depriving someone of their own stuff. Piracy is more akin to a massive crowdsourced library. We're all just helping to share the burden of hosting costs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] sit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why do I sneeze when I’m not even sick?

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Irritant particles in your nose. Or you may be someone with a photic sneeze reflex: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photic_sneeze_reflex

[–] sit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] k_rol@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Why is my voice so low in the morning?

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

Likely a contraction from a lack of activity while sleeping. Similar to how singers need to do vocal exercises to achieve the full range of what their voice can achieve wbich, in my experience, means being able to reach higher notes than lower notes.

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Your bed is too low to the ground, as we age our voices begin to struggle to get upright. Try whiskey.

I am not a Doctor, this is not medical advice.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Honestly, I don't have any issue using a pirated software for my own personal use.

I put the line where you use the software to make money.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago

Even then, I have no problem with self-employed people using it to make money. But if a corporation you work for does it: snitch and get that BSA payday.

[–] codexarcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Can purchasing anything within the system of monstrous exploitation called global capitalism be justified?

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No unless you lack self respect

Corporate is your enemy and paying them money is funding your own oppression

[–] Chakravanti@monero.town 1 points 6 days ago

I rarely see this explanation so well and shortly given.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] nesc@lemmy.cafe 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Is there a need for justification?

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 3 points 1 week ago

Corpos are not people, they deserve nothing, they are entitled to nothing.

I don't care what the government has to say on this issue. Useless fucking whores.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rolandtb303@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

if they put in DRM that makes the plugins 10x as big (looking at you, Acustica. I don't even use their plugins because of that), or they make the legit version have some bullshit always-online "all-in-one" software (i.e Native Access) which in turn makes the software a bit of a faff to get working in Linux (to install legit libraries for legit kontakt, native access stores those libraries as .iso files and does some virtual drive fuckery a la DAMEONTools), then yes, if the pirated version is quicker to set up and run (and install libraries for), it is justified imo.

Also i hate theaters and streaming services. I'd rather watch whatever movie I think is cool in the comfort of my PC rather than having to drive to the theater (if it's even on there in the first place), or paying for 9000 streaming services now and only watch like a couple of things. The wait for a good webrip (even more so for a BluRay) is worth it.

[–] style99@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Better question: Who decides what software "piracy" even is?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 4 points 1 week ago

Privateering

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There is nothing to justify.

I pirate because I want to see the world burn, among other things.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›