this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2023
159 points (83.8% liked)

Technology

59641 readers
2694 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 94 points 11 months ago (8 children)

I haven't even bought a 5G phone yet. My carrier keeps threatening to cut 4G coverage in various areas, and has already axed 3G entirely, rendering large swathes of otherwise perfectly functional devices useless. So far my 4G Moto Z still works. For now.

At this point my conspiracy opinion that the constant "generation" changes are mostly to just force people to buy/lease new phones and devices. Even pokey old 4G has always been more than fast enough for all of my mobile internet activities. Hell, even 3G was.

I have no less than four otherwise flawlessly functional phones in a desk drawer that just won't work with my cell carrier because they've either turned off 3G or discontinued the specific 4G bands those devices need.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (6 children)

What percentage of people use 3g only phones? If it's 1%, does it make sense to keep those services running just for those people?

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's not necessarily phones. It's trackers, monitoring devices, laptops, access points, and tablets that all run over 3G bands.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

I totally agree with you that generation changes are either currently or going to be used as a form of planned obsolescence. I reckon that within 10 years or so we’ll have sub generation types (things 6.5G) that will force people to buy new devices.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] krakenx@lemmy.world 71 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (6 children)

4G, 5G and now 6G are worthless if cell providers don't provide enough bandwidth to the towers. The range also keeps decreasing as the generations increase, so now there are these big gaps that 3G used to cover.

In my area, 5G is slower than 4G and both have lower signal and slower speeds than 3G used to have. I need a dual SIM phone and to constantly switch my phone between AT&T and T-Mobile, and both are crap. I only use about 1GB in total too, and I'm lucky if I can pull more than 1 megabit on either service. I miss 3G speeds, coverage, and competition.

Worst of all, AT&T is forcing home users to switch to a 5G hotspot from DSL. It's probably a big part of why the cell towers are always overloaded too. Imagine running your home internet on 1 megabit with constant drops...

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] solrize@lemmy.world 56 points 11 months ago (14 children)

"This is an important research question because we can see mobile traffic going up over the next decade by a factor of 10 or even a factor of 20. "

Wtf are they going to do with that? Always-on video from wireless devices everywhere? Holographic movies on every web page? It sounds terrible. I remember having to make phone calls for basic communication. These days you send a text or email, except now and then you want the higher bandwidth of a voice call. That is, we have been moving toward LESS bandwidth rather than more.

Whatever is imagined being done with all the new bandwidth can't be good.

[–] echo64@lemmy.world 58 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Your personal usage does not align with the majority. Look at tiktok, it's social media based around endless video files. It's not an occasional text or email, it's hundreds of videos that your constantly scrolling through.

[–] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 42 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The carriers love to brag about high capacity and fast speeds but they're still unwilling to deliver the bandwidth. They're all advertising "unlimited" data but if you scroll TikTok for a while they'll block your line for "excessive" data usage or throttle you down to 256kb/s.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] solrize@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

OK, good point. Are people using mobile data for that? Yes you're right I'm not on social media etc. Also I'm on a super cheap mobile plan with enough monthly data to check email and look at some occasional web pages, but if I want to watch a video I almost always use home internet for that. I guess if this super high bandwidth mobile stuff kills Comcast though, some good will have come out of it. The Register article talks mostly about IoT and "AI/ML" rather than social media though.

Is 5g mobile data cheaper for the end user than 4g in practice? The sticker prices and advertised data caps for monthly plans look to me to be about the same as before, but maybe more of the data cap is usable in practice.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (3 children)

OK, good point. Are people using mobile data for that?

Unlimited data. You do whatever you want, whenever you want, wherever you want.

I haven't seen any carriers charging extra for 5g but I don't see why it would be more expensive since the quicker you're done using the data the quicker the tower can serve someone else.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CeeBee@lemmy.world 43 points 11 months ago

Wtf are they going to do with that?

Show more ads

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They're making the data faster, but most plans are still limited to something ridiculous like 20G/month. What's the point of being able to stream 4K video or whatever if that's going to burn through your data allowance in seconds?

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

A huge part of newer mobile network generations is the increased capacity. Faster speeds is effectively the same as more capacity in the towers.

This means that companies could actually afford to start offering unlimited data caps, there just has to be the push to do so. But I do genuinely believe that within a decade there will be no more datacaps for mobile data in cities, at least (or at least plenty of plans with unlimited and no throttling). Well, idk about the US considering you got data caps on broadband, but, I'm sure Europe will get it.

[–] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And nobody will ever need more than 640K of memory, so the fact that even your cell phone carries vastly more than that must mean you yourself are up to no good, right?

Even if you're not dealing with a constant video stream, the power of the internet lies in moving vast amounts of data around. Yeah a lot of that information is based of corporate privacy invasion, but you also have things like medical databases or performing jobs remotely. I had gigabit routers in my home at a time when 10/100 routers were still typically used even in businesses. If you have a capability, someone will find a way to make use of it and new innovations will pop up that we hadn't even considered before. Imagine where we would be at if Xerox hadn't invented the mouse and GUI desktop years before personal home computers were even available.

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

All the examples you mention work fine with wired internet. No need to let the carriers keep gobbling RF spectrum for mobile.

someone will find a way to make use of it and new innovations will pop up

Nah, it's all surveillance dystopia from here on out.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] rar@discuss.online 46 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Most want ubiquitous and affordable/cheap mobile internet without the hassle of signing contracts. Moving tech tiers past 4G isn't relevant for consumers as of now.

[–] XTornado@lemmy.ml 38 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Said the Phone/ISPs top earning guys while looking at their bank accounts extracts.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 33 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Why don't we just skip 6G and just go straight to 7G

[–] Denalduh@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

If they're going to skip anything, it's going to be 8.. Because 7, 8, 9!

[–] ridethisbike@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Nah dude... That's why they skipped 9 because 7 ate it. 9 was never a viable option

[–] Hule@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

I mean, you might have a point there.

If seven ate nine, but you skip eight, it's all OK! Seven nine.

But.. But.. Seven ate nine.

You ate eight!

Seven nine!

Waaaahhh!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago (5 children)

If 5g makes the frog gay would 6g negate it?

[–] XTornado@lemmy.ml 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Nah this will be something related with Satan and 666 and hell and so on.

The 6 Gs of the apocalypse. G G G G G G

[–] Hule@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Gluttony, Gargoyle, Gollum, Ganesha, Gabriel, Gesus...

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 11 months ago
[–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 10 points 11 months ago

It makes them trans

[–] PinkPanther@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago

Nah dude, this time it'll make the snakes gay. 7g will affect even more species, where the end goal is 10g: make the planet gay!

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Well yes, since it makes the frog trans so it goes from gay to straight

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer@sh.itjust.works 29 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Silicon Valley really wants to make XR a thing.

Current tech does not need 5G and the shit that they think will need 6G is just needless XR systems that will be steaming an unjustifiable amount of data from the "cloud".

The enshittification continues. Happy 2024 folks

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 28 points 11 months ago (1 children)

With 4G covering all my needs flawlessly, idk if I'd need a new gen. With a laptop, probably, but a smartphone, or even tablet? Ping across the globe is a bigger offender than speeds. Having a 2-3 sec delay when calling anyone, even though having a smooth detailed picture, is more annoying than having a 480p and an instant response. Cloud gaming suffers from it too. But that's on ISPs, international lines, and that's harder to change than introducing the 6G in phones and local towers.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

mmwave 5g has some incredibly low latency compared to 4g. You'd be surprised how much of your latency is just from you to the tower.

Right now when it's not busy mmwave 5g doing a speed test I have 45ms latency and 3ms of jitter. 4g is 54ms with 12ms of jitter. When the network is loaded there's a HUGE difference. 5g can handle so many more people at once so your latency is never really that high. But when 4g is loaded down latency gets huge fast.

Ping from china to me in the US is sub 250ms on my wired internet connection so that's not really the problem. The rest is whoever is doing your phone call.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Obviously being remotely planted in your brain with radio waves to control your mind and actions, like voting for [OPPOSITE POLITICAL PARTY] or making you throb and drip for [OPPOSITE PREFERRED GENDER]. Wake up sheeple!!!11!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I can hear the conspiracies already!

[–] UndulyUnruly@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The wave forms of 6G will physically break the ankles of birds in flight and neuter your dog through the roof of the house. Yoghurt will never taste the same and your feet will go up two sizes forcing you to buy new shoes. The writing is clearly on the wall.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Resol@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago (4 children)

We Moroccans don't even have 5G countrywide yet, and yet you guys are already prepping for 6G? At least wait for everyone to catch up.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Adanisi@lemmy.zip 12 points 11 months ago

I have no 5G where I live. Maybe it's time to wait??

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 10 points 10 months ago

WE DIDN'T NEED 5G

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Does this mean we can do proper voice over 4G already? Last time I heard it was just for the selected phone models with specific software.

[–] Kystael@lemmy.ca 8 points 11 months ago

Qualcomm is erect

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] ahriboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 11 months ago

GTA V has 9G LMAO

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] notannpc@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

I’m still waiting for 5G to revolutionize everything like every carrier promised it would.

it would be difficult to make it good

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

The fact that she's wearing a yellow shirt in the article thumbnail makes this just 👌

https://youtube.com/watch?v=RKc4QhMSFG8

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think I might be the person who benefitted most from 5G. I live in mid-size city that gets overrun with tourists a few times a year. The speed upgrade hasn’t mattered much but it’s been awhile since I couldn’t get on the network because of capacity problems. It used to happen half the time I was in a crowd. LTE basically never worked well at big sporting events and concerts.

That might not be because of 5G tech, though. Maybe carriers just got better at deploying extra capacity for major events?

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Excessive traffic, like sporting events, concerts, fairs, natural disasters etc. Are a lot of fun to engineer. A lot of times they will use a cell on wheels or COW. At first mobile operators didn't order a lot of these, but slowly increased their stock.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›