Cool. Any time things actually get fun and spicy in the internet the cops show up. I guess there wasn't enough shitty beanis memes or discussion about video games treats here. Let's let the only good website on the entire internet backslide into reddit I guess.
this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)
chapotraphouse
13630 readers
788 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Like it's fine to discuss the case and all but it should not come with any assumptions of him actually being the guy
Can you at least edit the OP to clarify? How can anyone interpret "any and all Luigi posting is banned" as anything other than people aren't allowed to discuss anything to do with the case?
from this comm
Ok? Did I contradict that part or something? I'm confused why you are pointing this out.
People are allowed to discuss the case, luigi etc. Just not specifically in c/chapotraphouse per this thread. It's not like this is the only comm. I'm fine with it we don't need the entire site full of this shit.
So they aren't allowed to post about the case at all in this comm? Because the comment I originally replied to seems to suggest people can post about it in this comm and that is why I asked them to clarify in the OP. I'm not the only person in the comments with this same confusion.
So they aren't allowed to post about the case at all in this comm?
I would presume this to be the case. Tbh, if we are talking about the case that should be done in dedicated c/news posts and if we are memeing the guy, that should go in memes (unless c/news and c/memes are gonna have a similar moderation policy in which case 
that's up to the mods of those respective communities. ) As a certified luigiposting hater I wouldn't have any complaints if this is the case.
Great, wouldn't it be cool if they clarified so we wouldn't even have to presume? I don't post and rarely comment here in this comm, but it is one of the most active places and banning all discussions about a topic seems really extreme given the topic is very relevant to leftist causes. I agree this Luigi person probably didn't do it and is being railroaded. I also don't really care to see a bunch of posts about this shit on every comm. I just want the OP to clarify the rules so we can follow them.
i agree with nako on this one more than the previous navelgazing - trial hasn't progressed an inch and therefore not a shred of evidence has been presented. any news coming out, other than statements from luigi's lawyer, are crafted statements from the NYPD and FBI to a compliant corporate media specifically designed to influence any jury into associating the name luigi with "CEO murderer" and should be fucking dismissed out of hand.
in fact, the only thing that should be happening from now on is a mass campaign of sowing doubt about all facets of the case.
there's no proof luigi was the adjuster, there's no proof luigi was holding a gun when arrested, there's no real proof of a single fucking thing - only bullshit claims from a pack of bumbling pigs who cannot be trusted whatsoever and should never be given any benefit of the doubt ever, who couldn't find the adjuster for 5 days and didn't know a fucking thing. If a police officer is speaking, either out of their own mouth or through a mouthpiece in the press, they're fucking lying and should be laughed at and spat on
They changed narratives about the gun at least two times (from a Glock to an obscure firearm to 3d printed gun), they released that "manifesto" that is uncharacteristically short compared with other shooter manifestos (ie the intern typing the manifesto had to rush to type a short fake one and push it out to the press in a timely manner), footage either doesn't match his facial features and clothes or is too unreliable from compression/video artifacts to pin him as the shooter, and the whole thing about him getting caught at McDonalds doesn't really stand up to scrutiny honestly.
Shit like "uh aktually, he shot the CEO because he has a fucked up back and got fucked over by UnitedHealth" doesn't mean a goddamn thing because it's trivially easy to find millions of USians who were also fucked over by UnitedHealth. There is probably at least a million USians, personally ruined by UnitedHealth or had family/friends who were personally ruined by UnitedHealth, who wanted that CEO dead. The shooter was just one out of a million who stepped up.
The only real hole behind Luigi being a patsy is that the state tends to not use rich kids as patsies. But there's nothing stopping Luigi from being a copycat with no real plan who got caught at an unfortunate time and who the state is trying to pin as the shooter. It does explain the massive discrepancy between how the shooter was so calm at liquidating the CEO (most people who have never killed before, and certainly sheltered rich kids who have never faced real adversity, don't have it in them to be so calm after taking someone's life) and was so good at covering their tracks and how the official narrative portrays the post-shooting actions of the shooter as being a bumbling idiot.
At the end of the day, people can and will believe what they want to believe. I don't really care whether people actually think Luigi did it or not, but please have some discernment. ACAB includes not uncritically swallowing whatever narrative the pigs are trying to push.
That “manifesto” was like 1/4 the length of the average reply in a Hexbear struggle session 😬