this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
169 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

32442 readers
826 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On Librewolf i got 16.48 bits of information, on TOR browser 10.32 bits, but on Tails I managed to get only 9.3 bits.

https://coveryourtracks.eff.org/

(page 2) 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LastoftheDinosaurs@walledgarden.xyz 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Within our dataset of several hundred thousand visitors tested in the past 45 days, only one in 91389.5 browsers have the same fingerprint as yours.

Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that conveys 16.48 bits of identifying information

Doesn't look good. How do you make it so that your browser doesn't have a fingerprint at all?

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tyler@programming.dev 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How does tails get the bits so low?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kekmacska@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

16.47 on Cromite. But most of the identify information is not even true, almost everything is spoofed. User agent, timezone, operating system, browser name, screen size and color depth, device, even the battery percentage

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

I misread the title as "Cover your taxes" and got really excited to earn about tax avoidance tips. Legal ones obviously.

[–] eleitl@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

Vanadium: Your Results Within our dataset of several hundred thousand visitors tested in the past 45 days, only one in 61101.0 browsers have the same fingerprint as yours.

Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that conveys 15.9 bits of identifying information.

I get 8.44 bits (1 in 347.34 browsers). I use Firefox with Arkenfox user.js applied on top, with some of my own custom overrides.

However, I think the biggest factor could be because I have Ublock Origin set to medium-hard mode (block 1st party scripts, 3rd party scripts and 3rd party iframes by default on all websites), so the lack of JavaScript heavily affects what non-whitelisted websites can track. I did whitelist 1st-party scripts on the main domain for this test (coveryourtracks.eff.org), but all the 'tracker' site redirects stay off the whitelist.

I actually had to allow Ublock Origin to temporarily visit the tracker sites for the test to properly finish--otherwise it gives me a big warning that I'm about to visit a domain on the filter list.

[–] CubbyTustard@reddthat.com 4 points 1 week ago (7 children)

with budget vpn on: one in 22756.25 browsers have the same fingerprint as yours

with budget vpn off and just apple safebrowsing on: one in 20231.22 browsers have the same fingerprint as yours.

i have the worst vpn!

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

I appreciate the site, but what score is considered good or bad? A cool stat would be some kind of score compared to everyone else.

[–] OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Best methods to lower the score on android? I tested multiple browsers on EFF. 17 bits regardless of browser.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 3 points 1 week ago

Interesting, this is a cool test! Unsurprisingly, my setup is rather unique.

One thing that stood out to me is that it failed to detect my adblocker. Also, my screen size alone is unique: 1 in 181697 of this 181697 browsers tested.

What would be considered a high score on this? Is 16 too high?

[–] LambdaRX@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

After disabling extension "I still don't care about cookies" on Librewolf, I went from 17.48 bits unique fingerprint to 16.48 nearly unique one.

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If I tried twice and I got a unique id both times, does it mean Firefox is covering my track ?

[–] astropenguin5@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Idk, but I have the same. Scrolling through the tracking methods the only ones with high uniqueness were hash of canvas fingerprint and hash of webGL for me. According to it I still have strong protection Firefox + ublock on mobile though

[–] kusivittula@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

if it ran the test again, I'd say yes. but if it just reloads the result page, doesn't mean anything

yeah I was wondering if the tool would show that hit saws this id once already

[–] DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

17.47 on mobile Vivaldi.

[–] ripley@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

It seems like the characteristics of my Android tablet doom me here - I was unique even using Chrome.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›