this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
122 points (95.5% liked)

politics

19240 readers
2945 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Gallup poll released this week but conducted before the killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, found that most Americans, 62%, think it is the responsibility of the federal government to make sure that all Americans have health care coverage. A minority, 36%, said it’s not the government’s responsibility.

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 64 points 1 week ago

Two reasons:

  1. Money

  2. A lack of dead CEOs.

because half the voting population doesnt bother voting at all, for starters. a huge number of those that do vote are under the influence of severe money-driven propaganda telling them that 'thats socialsim, and thats evil. literally hitler'

[–] Bridger@sh.itjust.works 50 points 1 week ago

It's called regulatory capture. The medical insurance companies own the medical insurance regulatory agencies. Fundamentally, it's corruption.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago

dolla dolla bill.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago

It's worse than you think. We've been trying. The first Democratic administration to push for universal healthcare was Truman.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 32 points 1 week ago

Because keeping it broken is extremely profitable.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 31 points 1 week ago

The citizens always have, but they have limited power.

The US has been an oligarchy for far longer than many people will admit.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 week ago

Because the people who are profiting from it spend part of that money to protect their interest.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Because the media, often called the 4th estate here is long dead. For the better part of the last century it's increasingly been a corpse reanimated by the ownership class. And now the remaining rotted flesh is being scrapped and stretched over constructs of silicon and steel.

There's constantly little trickles leaking out. Showing that Americans aren't that divided. That we agree far more than we disagree. But that doesn't sell your attention span. Fascist media is always ready with someone powerless minority group to blame for our problems. Liberal media always there to tell us to be outraged and march against it. Pitting us against each other. Just so what recently happened doesn't happen. Where we can look at each other and collectively identify the oligarchs as the problem.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'll add this: There are millions of Americans employed in the insurance and medical fields who are afraid they won't have a job under universal health care.

Upton Sinclair — 'It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.'

[–] chakan2@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

It's less than 1% of the nation. And frankly, fuck them. If we add a point to unemployment by helping out the rest of America, so be it.

[–] chakan2@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Because the average person doesn't understand insurance and believes all the lies the GoP is throwing at them about universal healthcare.

My favorite like is from people who say "I like my insurance." Oh. Really? Have you seen a specialist for anything recently? Then no. You haven't used your insurance.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

The nature of the problem intrinsically supports divide and conquer.

It's not a problem for you until it is, and once it is you have bigger problems

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Because it's working as intended. Shareholders are making bank. That's all that matters in the USA.

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

It's not a problem, it's working as designed.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 7 points 1 week ago

Because the health insurance industry is operating exactly as designed.

[–] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Our last update was almost 15 years ago, and the country has spent those years arguing if those were worth keeping. We almost rolled them all back during the last time Trump was in office.

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

Well good thing they voted for Trump...

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

Capitalism.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nothing happens in the US without someone getting paid. Maybe we need to start a PAC?

[–] vulgarcynic@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

The Americans for America PAC!

[–] ramsorge@discuss.online 4 points 1 week ago

lol. Because “what’s good for business is good for the country.”

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 1 week ago

The majority of the population have any to no weight in policy. Need to check the opinions of the 1%, who actually have the power to determine policy.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago
[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

What problems? $$$

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There is a see-saw. The more insurance covers, the more it costs. So there will either be a healthcare cost "problem" (when insurance covers not enough, we are here) or a health insurance cost "problem" (this is what it was like prior to the ACA, everything was covered but many couldn't afford it).

Getting everyone on insurance got rid of the people that would go to the hospital without it an eventual die in it. The hospitals would have to eat the costs and pass that on to everyone else. ACA use to have a lot of stuff that all health insurance HAD TO cover, but the GOP has been slowly eating away at that list.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's not actually true that the more insurance covers, the more it costs. A lot of preventative and early diagnosing care actually saves money in the long run. This is the kind of situation where details matter a lot.

But actually, that alone should not form the basis of policy, because sometimes it's better to spend money dealing with problems while they're still small problems, because the point is to make people's lives better, not to have the cheapest possible system. That all being said, the only way to fix the US system is to throw it all out the window.

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

A lot of preventative and early diagnosing care actually saves money in the long run.

What things do you think the GOP are targeting to get rid of off of ACA coverage?

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

We need a single-payer, universal healthcare system like they have in every other developed country. It's the only way to control cost and make sure that everyone is covered.

[–] noxy@yiffit.net -1 points 1 week ago

Proof that there are, in fact, stupid questions