604
Democratic President rebuilds economy, just in time to hand it off to Trump — again
(www.huffpost.com)
He looks horrible
this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
604 points (96.7% liked)
politics
19240 readers
2503 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Trump always looks horrid, it's just genuinely baffling he can even move. I'd be shocked if he doesn't die in office on this term.
President Jorkin Dapeanus Vance. Horrifying.
Why does he look like Kim Jong Un in this picture 😂
Just a small boy too scared to do anything but try and act tough.
He kind of looks like that sad cat meme
load more comments
(2 replies)
https://www.bls.gov/charts/consumer-price-index/consumer-price-index-by-category-line-chart.htm
This is a chart showing percentage difference over 12 months of CPI for the last 20 years. Biden's presidency came with less than 1% inflation which only rise to record levels in the first 2 years. It has come down to high 2% and settled at that level.
In the last 12 months everything other than energy prices have rise by 2.4%. A 2-2.4% in prices after having 2 years of near 10% inflation.
You can see how Democrats saying that they have done good for economy and common man seems hollow.
With the years:
Biden's term started in 2021, CPI peaked in 2022 and fell just as quickly.
Inflation actually peaked in Mid-2021 and fell.
I am not saying Biden or Democrats didn't do anything,
My point is 1$ thing was 1.1$ at the end of 2022, 1.12$ 2023 and 1.15$ at the end of 2024 when voting happened. The rise in food was much more substantial.
While at the same time, there was no growth in salary and the constant threat of being laid off.
Edit 1: People have a very limited memory and the mere perception that things are bad and wont change. It is understandable if they are uninterested in either outcome.
And we should be thankful because it could have been, and almost certainly will be, much worse under Republican management.
The only way to truly solve these problems is with a supermajority willing to tax the rich and expand benefits and protections to the needy and working class, but the USA voted against that so they won't get solutions. In fact, the Republicans are primed to write the new Tax Plan when the old one expires in 2026, and their last plan was fucking catastrophic, so sucks to suck for them.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Womp womp. I'm convinced these idiots think maniacs like trump coming in to raid government coffers is advantageous to themselves some how. I know there might be a criminal network where this is true but not the entire fucking GOP.
It's insane how the right controls the narrative so hard that some people believe in earnest that they have good economic policy when it really just is, "gubberment don't work, now gibbme all that money, nom nom nom."
The problem with assertions like this is that they can never be conclusively proven or disproven. Literally every single president (at least during my lifetime) has blamed their predecessor for all of the problems plaguing the country and took credit for everything that improved, while their predecessor claimed credit for laying the groundwork and blamed their predecessor for all the challenges they faced.
The fundamental issue is that the same experiment can never be conducted twice under controlled conditions, because the world doesn't stop spinning and whatever the other guy did, he did, and we can't turn back time in order to find out how his opponent's choices would have played out. Sure, you can always pick and choose some factoids in order to spin a compelling "what if" scenario, but ultimately there's simply too many variables at play in order to reach a sufficiently solid conclusion.
load more comments
(4 replies)
Nope