this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
258 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2625 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It is weird - now that donvict has "won", his stupid base now thinks the economy is great. And donvict has not even slithered his way into power yet. I bet more than a few of his brainstems think that the price of eggs are now "great" again.

These same idiots are going to have to find someone not themselves, not conservatives and definitely not donvict when all his stupid policies come home to roost and start eating their faces...donflation will be a very, very real thing quite soon, it seems.

[–] smayonak@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He said he would impose the tariffs if he can't hammer out a deal on illegal immigration and drug smuggling. In other words he's leaving a way out

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In his last presidency he blocked Canadian aluminium to force companies to buy from China

Don’t expect a way out

[–] smayonak@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yoy are probably right. It looks more like this is a pretext to cause a recession in Canada which would doom the already flailing Trudeau presidency. Even if Canada adopted the kind of border policy the Trump wanted, that still wouldn't stop illegals or drugs.

[–] LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

Trudeau is Prime Minister not President and he's already wildly unpopular so he's going to lose no matter what.

[–] admin@maple.social 5 points 1 day ago

There's no way out. USA is responsible for their own borders. Canada as a matter of fact has reciprocal agreements with USA law enforcement organizations.

[–] Apollonius_Cone@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

What a windbag! I wonder why I was so reluctant to have Canada enter into a free trade agreement with the US because eventually Darth Vader gets into power. With our current trade agreements, you can't unilaterally impose tariffs without implications. Bilateral trade between Canada and the US survived the first Rump presidency and it will outlive him.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Time to get a shit ton of stickers with smug Trump saying "I did this!".

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Does anyone know where to buy these in bulk?

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago
[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is going to really throw a fucking bomb on the WTO. Like complete collapse of international trade adjudication and just viscous multilateral trade wars. US will have neither imports or exports. The farmers are going to be pissed when their market collapses due to retaliatory tariffs.

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Last time this happened, they were thrilled to take it to the chin since it meant ‘helping Trump’. I foresee them cheering this on too, even as they fall into poverty and have to sell the farm.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Eww@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There will be lots of places to put the new Trump "I did that" stickers.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I kinda want to do this just to get some petty revenge on the fuckers that plastered gas pumps with Biden stickers (which they then had to remove when gas fell back down to normal prices eventually lol)

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I had to laugh when I saw those being scraped off post-haste, because it actually looked fantastic (For Biden that is! And the fucking morons that plastered "FUCK BIDEN" on t-shirts, flags and so on - even in front of children - didn't want to make Biden look good, dog forbid!), given the prices at the time.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Does someone make these? I'd like to buy them in bulk.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 88 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

Ford, GM, Chrysler instantly regretting their republican pac contributions as Toyota comes to eat their lunch even harder.

(Toyota assembly and majority sourcing for USDM is done entirely within the US while domestic companies have mostly outsourced to Mexico heavily)

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 62 points 1 day ago

How can I succinctly put it? Hmm..

[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

Toyota and Honda(Ohio, baby)

Just got set up.

I hope they both roll strikes because I love em both.

[–] Dupree878@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

My dad’s Tundra was built in Indiana My Camaro was built in Quebec

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Those companies will just bribe him into writing in an exemption for them.

Grift >>>>> Governance

[–] JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

It will affect Canada a lot more.

Even with 25% tariffs, it will still be cheaper to make in Mexico. And they will no longer have to pay the workers the same as the US, as they do under USMC.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] atheridis@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

You know what? I believe him

[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

I'm half pleased.

I was pissed when he won, mad that this madman and his regime was in control of America.

Now I don't think they have the capacity to control anything, and they have more of a shot at destabilizing modern society than ruling it.

They should keep building the tower of shit higher. It's a great building material.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 93 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Trump vastly misunderstands how foreign dependent America's bullshit economy of e-slop, finance, and exploiting health issues is.

A trade war right after he kicks out the only people who actually make shit in America would be fucking hilarious if it wasn't so fucking dire.

[–] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, he doesn't but his policy writers do know. It's called shock doctrine.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Shock_Doctrine

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

This aligns perfectly with a bit I read that said that social movements and protest movements largely form and organize under progressive / non-repressive political situations where the people aren't so busy fighting for their basic survival that they can get more involved in politics.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Many small but important parts come from China nowadays. Parts we use directly, and those that end up in things people buy: screws and bolts, electronic parts, all kinds of plastic products. The US no longer has the machines or manpower to produce those parts on their own, and will still have to buy them in China.

Brace for inflation in the US like you have last seen in the 1920s.

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 70 points 1 day ago (1 children)

* does not apply to Chinese made MAGA hats

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago

Literally. He also exempted his own daughter's clothing company last time.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 50 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I am prepared for prices in general to rise. I am also prepared to explain why to every dipshit Trumper I see in my vicinity.

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 72 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If I owned a store, I'd itemize the Trump Tariff on every receipt, and a total for how much extra you paid because of him.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (12 children)

I love this

Edit: I also think taxes should be itemized on US paystubs, like is done in many civilized nations.

One reason so many in the US hate taxes automatically is because it is a black hole into which we have no insights (on paystubs).

[–] Alue42@fedia.io 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Your paystub (in the US) should state how exactly much is going to Medicare, unemployment, social security, disability, and general state and federal income for various programs (highway repair, workforce development, etc depending how your state uses income tax). If this is not on each of your paystubs, speak to your payroll department.

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

As long as they have to itemize military spending honestly and can't call it all "defense".

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

What I mean is: where it says "federal" -- what federal programs specifically are my taxes going towards? This is a type of itemization that does not exist in the US. We just get rather generic buckets like "federal", "state" etc. Medicare and Social Security get close.

[–] Pips@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 11 hours ago

What national government anywhere in the world specifies the federal programs paid for by taxes on an employee pay stub?

[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

I think the issue is that there would simply be too many different possible buckets, that it wouldn't exactly be very helpful to you.

It's easier to check and see that x% went to your federal taxes, than to see that 0.000001% went to this government program, and 0.0000126% went to this program, and...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 day ago

Stupid scandals should get ‘-a-Lago’ pinned to their arse.

Tariff-a-Lago is a go.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Cool cool cool, looks like it's trade war time. Surely this'll be to the benefit of anyone.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And right after deporting all the farmers, too! Trump speed runs America's first famine since the great depression.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Who knew the Great in MAGA was the Great Depression all this time.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zier@fedia.io 23 points 1 day ago (12 children)

Roma's $1.25/lb + trump = $1.56/lb Cucumbers .85/ea + trump = $1.06/ea Avocado .99/ea + trump = $1.24/ea Asparagus 2.99/lb + trump = $3.73/lb

And that's at an affordable supermarket. Add 10-15% more for places like walmart, albertsons, kroger, etc.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

Don't forget to add an extra 25% for all the companies using the tariffs as excuses to raise prices further to extract profit.

They did it with covid, they'll do it again now.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] shads@lemy.lol 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

So I was thinking about the way he worded this, 25% tariff until the border crossings stop. I think he might be onto a 4D chess move here.

If he tanks the US economy so badly that it's financially detrimental to cross the border then the flow of people across the border will definitely come down. If he tanks the economy hard enough we may even see the flow reverse, at which point he can lift the tariffs and declare the job done.

He is already happy to make Americans ignorant, illiterate, and spiteful to outsiders; is he really going to baulk at making them dirt poor as well?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›