this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
31 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3142 readers
103 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 10 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The total better be divisible by twelve

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Curious what word you would use.

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

"number of councils"?

The article refers to " 21 county councils operate across England, with 164 district councils acting under them".

It is district councils which may be abolished, so the maximum number can even be 164.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Except they do not know the number. 3 county councils are agreeing to try this out. According to the article. But nothing indicates that will lead to all district councils under them being closed.

The number you give are nationwide. This is not happening nationwide, Only with councils willing to work with them. They do not seem to know that number.

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Read again. Instead of saying "dozens of councils" they should have said "number of councils".

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

They don't know the number closing. ATM no one dose.

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Precisely. Which is why saying "dozens of councils" made no sense. "Number of councils due to close" covers everything from just a couple to 164 or whatever the maximum number is.

[–] Mex@feddit.uk 2 points 4 weeks ago

a number of is generally not recommended when "Some councils..." or even "An unknown number of councils" would be better.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 2 points 4 weeks ago

Oh I see what you are saying now. Yeah a better word.

[–] Schal330@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

I feel like one goal of this is to get rid of the blockers from housing development so that the government can try to reach their targets. I doubt we'll see any improvements to waste collection, especially as in my area they are looking at changing the collection to every 2 weeks..