this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
637 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

59555 readers
3774 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 200ok@lemmy.world 179 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Alphabet’s Chief Legal Officer Kent Walker, says the DOJ is pushing “a radical interventionist agenda that would harm Americans and America’s global technology leadership.”

I'm honestly curious how this would "harm Americans".

[–] ladicius@lemmy.world 76 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That statement is technically true.

The billionaire owners are Americans.

[–] Beldarofremulak@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Everyone really does need to have that at the forefront of their mind. When the C-suit, wall street, and politicians talk about "Americans" they aren't talking about us schlubs.

[–] Homescool@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

The corporations are people too!

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 86 points 1 day ago

Google pretending they have any other nationality other then “the global internet” is cute in a disgusting way.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Alphabet’s Chief Legal Officer sounds like Donald Trump

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

I fear this is exactly who they're courting.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The same ruling would ban Google from paying other browsers to make Google the default search engine.
This would kill Firefox and make Chromium the only browser engine that's left.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

People wondering what Chrome has to do with a search monopoly:

The obvious benefit is that they can default the user's search provider to Google.

But the more nefarious benefit is that, by controlling both the client and server, they can unilaterally decide the future of web standards. They don't have to advocate for proposals, gain consensus, and limit themselves to well-supported standards the way other companies do. They can just do it, gain the first-mover advantage, and force others to follow suit.

If they don't like HTTP/2, they can invent their own protocol and implement it for their search servers and Chrome. Suddenly, using Chrome with Google Search is way faster than using Chrome with Bing or using Firefox with Google Search. Even if Microsoft and Mozilla don't like the protocol, they now have to adopt it or fall behind.

This has happened. QUIC was deployed in 2012. Firefox gained support in 2021.

They're doing the same thing with Privacy Sandbox, and you can also look at browser feature compatibility tables to see how eager Google is to force their own interpretation of every not-yet-finalized web standard as the canonical interpretation.

Edit: Also, JPEG XL vs. WebP.

[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (5 children)

Just...please for the love of whatever diety do Microsoft. Fucking sick of their shit recently with One Drive.

[–] xylogx@lemmy.world 15 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Do you have a few minutes to learn about our lord and savior Linux?

[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 12 points 21 hours ago (7 children)

Man the Linux propaganda is STRONG on Lemmy. I'll say what I've said before: I use my computer for gaming, web browsing, and managing a media server for my family that hosts pictures and other things. If those 3 things can be done easily without issue on a Linux distro without having to fuck around with configs every time I want to do something, I'm all in. By what I've heard though it's just not there yet. I am super happy Steam decided to go Linux for their Steamdeck though as I've heard thats helped make monumental strides the right direction. Trust me, I want to. Large part of it is I worked tech support for over a decade and having to troubleshoot my own shit is like the furthest thing I want to deal with haha

[–] ouch@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

If you can live without games having invasive anticheat, then everything should be doable, and probably a lot easier than in Windows.

[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah not really into multiplayer competitive games. Indo play a lot of co op though. Will have to find a list somewhere.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zink@programming.dev 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

You owe it to yourself to try it out! I recommend dual booting into Linux Mint Cinnamon for a while and have your windows install to fall back on to. That or one of the gaming-specific distributions, but from what I’ve seen Mint does all with gaming too. It’s a good all-around starting place, and there are a lot of resources because it’s popular and built off of the most popular distro. I installed it on my work machine (software engineering) and I’ve felt no lack of capability or a need to switch to a more “hardcore” distro.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 8 points 1 day ago

All mega corps but it won't happen

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 3 points 21 hours ago

Microsoft is waaay easier to avoid than fucking google. Is one drive that annoying?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] xylogx@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago (5 children)

Who would buy this and how would they monetize it? In browser ads? A freemium paid model to remove the ads?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] 200ok@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If they're allowed to choose who they sell it to this won't change anything

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 49 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think they should sell it to me.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] otter@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 day ago

Too much for me, I'm out 🏳️

[–] Zaphod@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 day ago

Sell it to Mozilla so they can make it uninstall itself and install Firefox instead in the next update

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Hot take: they sell Chrome but keep Chromium.

[–] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 day ago

Seeing how tech illiterate some of these people are, I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s what ends up happening

load more comments (2 replies)

Step 1: Buy Chome

Step 2: End development

Step 3: ???

Step 4: ~~Profit?~~ Non-Profit Firefox?

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (6 children)

They should force it to become a worker cooperative. It's the only solution that doesn't allow for corruption

[–] Freefall@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

brOURser comrade.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's literally so much else they should do, google docs, sheets, drive, phones, maps, earth, calendar, play store, translate, etc.
Good work, continue please.

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What is the issue with docs, sheets, drive, phones, calendar, play store?

There seems to be plenty of options in all of these spaces. Play store isn't even on a lot of android devices.

[–] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Correct. My example for another necessary intervention would be YouTube. That's a space in which Google does have a monopoly.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›