this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
639 points (99.7% liked)

News

23413 readers
2319 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

An Idaho doctor testified that confusion over the state’s strict abortion bans left a miscarrying patient “passed around like a hot potato” as doctors avoided treating her out of fear of legal consequences.

The 14-week pregnant woman, suffering heavy bleeding and anemia, was denied care during three ER visits before being admitted against hospital rules, miscarrying, and requiring a blood transfusion.

The testimony is part of a lawsuit challenging Idaho’s abortion laws, which ban most abortions with few exceptions, leaving patients in dangerous situations without timely care.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ElectroVagrant@lemmy.world 147 points 1 week ago (2 children)

At this point these abortion bans should be called Matricide Approvals

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 62 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Genuinely, they should be called Matricide Laws. Tank it the same way Republicans keep trying to tank "Obamacare"

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 30 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Matricide is too fancy a word.

Give it something simpler and more outrageous, like “Killing Moms Law” and talk about the Trump death panels who chose this.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

Nah you gotta balance the number of syllables in each word to make it catchy. "Dead Moms Law" or "Mommy Murder Law"

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

Widower-maker.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Mama murder pact

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They're the ones who came up with the name Obamacare, so that it would tank on name alone.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes, exactly. Which is why people should start going to town hall meetings, Senate hearings, etc. and asking various questions about "Matricide Laws." When they get corrected that these are abortion bans, explain that the law is killing hopeful mothers and these lawmakers are okay with it—if matricide wasn't the point, it certainly appears to be a welcome side-effect.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Remember when Republicans hated the idea of death panels?

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Every private insurer has a death panel that is only accountable to share holders. Progressives need to start framing stuff in those terms instead of letting the Republicans bully them into accepting their framing.

[–] nomous@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The republican party is constantly able to dominate the conversation. Every election cycle they decide whether immigration/economics/war/whatever is what will be discussed and the democrats try to play defense instead of just calling them out.

"Death panels already exist do you want them to be purely for-profit?" it's not even that hard they're just incompetent.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Part of it is that they want to placate their "moderate" wing too (read: the donors). If your plan is Medicare for All, you can say that and it's easy to explain to people. If your plan is the Affordable Care Act, you'll still have the for profit death panels, so you'd have to say something like: 'we'll regulate the existing death panels slightly more and force you to sign up to them', which doesn't actually sound that great.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

Every accusation is a confession. These won’t be the only death panels, either. Far, far worse is to come. They’re willing to kill anyone in defence of their supposed ‘superior morals’.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Every accusation is a confession.

Edit: Ah should have read down before replying, but fuck it, it bears repeating.

[–] Clent@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

These aren't death panels, they are death funnels.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 63 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Hollywood should start making movie after movie where the protagonist loses a loved one to some fucking asinine Republican laws, and then just goes on a vengeance spree.

Build a whole new MCU-style universe just around the backwards-ass shitstain policies coming out of these freeloader states, and a whole cast of kid-diddling fuckwads who are taken out by the wrath of righteous anger. People would watch that shit.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 17 points 1 week ago

They aborted his wife... He's not pro-life anymore

Fourth Trimester: coming soon to a theatre near you

[–] brlemworld@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is this the second plot that Hallmark has discovered?

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Hero drops a card on the bodies of his fallen enemies

"Have a Hallmark moment, assholes"

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That would be awesome.

Get Bruce Willis to do it.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

A 90s Bruce, definitely. Today's, not so much...

Perhaps Jason Statham? Bruce Campbell?

[–] officermike@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, they've already co-opted the Punisher - an anti-cop vigilante - into their iconography, despite being the party of the "thin blue line" and "the party of law and order." Anything we could hope to create to satirize them would just arouse them without a sense of irony or self awareness.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

The boys would disagree. You just make it more and more obvious who the bad guys are, the longer it goes.

[–] KittyCat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

"God Bless America" is almost that

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 50 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Hot potato is the Republican form of health care.

[–] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oh patients get hot potatoe'd all the time it's just usually they're full code violent dementia patients. OB hot potatoes are just the new fad in overly legally complicated patients no one wants to be officially responsible for when they die. The republican party is the party of the freedom to die in a ditch full of maggots when your ~~death panel~~ insurance review board (chaired by an eye doctor who's been out of practice for 10 years after committing fraud) denies your chemo treatment juuust long enough that you're better off dying quickly and getting out of their hair.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Anyone else remember Death Panels?

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago

I don't think insurance claim review boards went away.

They have concepts of a plan though.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 43 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"I was working with some amazing nurses and we decided as a team that we were going to break our hospital's rules and admit her, even though she wasn't 20 weeks pregnant because I just couldn't send her home again and hope for the best," Lyons said.

More like this please. Fuck your hospital's rules, make something up if you need to, this is someone's life. Bureaucracy isn't really very good at checking itself and a lot of rules get broken "by mistake". If the rules are bad, don't follow them. If anyone actually gets on your case, "I'm sorry, I guess I misremembered the policy and was worried about protecting the hospital from liability".

Employees on the front lines have a lot more power to grind dumb rules to dust than they think.

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago

It just sucks that it was her FOURTH visit to the ER.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

First do no harm

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Isn’t this a more Kafka version of death panels that we were promised under Obamacare.

There is no death panel however you have been deemed to die by the death panel. Good luck navigating the bureaucracy.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago

You have to actually read a book to even know what you mean when you say "Kafka." So good luck convincing anyone with that.

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

Over-kafka systems have worked so well when dealing with immigration, disability, medical, and veteran affairs. Worked well as in saved money by not providing services because they made them too complicated.

[–] whithom@discuss.online 17 points 1 week ago

She miscarried? Damn, life in prison.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They should just exclude pregnancy, births and anything associated with it from health care.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Women should be screaming in agony and bleeding out in their beds at home, as god intended. Pain and death in childbirth is the price of Eve’s sin, and only the pure and righteous earn an easy pregnancy.

I am not kidding, I’ve heard this from evangelical extremists (who have now been voted into power).

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

and the big argument that a lot of first world countries debate is the lowering birth rates ... why in the hell would anyone want to have children in this environment?

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

These people don’t ask women for permission.

[–] t3h_fool@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I believe you, that something like this was said, but in this age where the web is at our command, "some evangelical somewhere said that" seems needlessly vague and unconvincing.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

I can’t remember their names, but one is a televangelist preacher and the other is a woman who’s claiming to be a prophet. They’re both fairly well known. They were in a recent compilation video of evangelical sermons.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yes, but then where would they get good little soldiers for the meat grinder from?

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

There's always North Korea /s

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Test tube babies probably ... because giving natural birth has become so politicized and affected by religious beliefs that fewer people will actually want to have children and countries will try to figure out alternative ways of creating expendable humans.

Well no worries, once Trump is in office these women won't have any healthcare available to them.

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

It's going to get worse. What I have not seen is how we help. What actions can we take today, tomorrow, and next week will help those impacted by this step backward? I get being mad. I get being informed. But elections put us in a precarious place and real people need help tomorrow...now. Every one of these articles should include a call to action and I have a 9 to 5 trying to keep mine above water so just tell me. We need to solve problems.