this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
117 points (95.3% liked)

News

23361 readers
3682 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 80 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's just posturing. Putin knows he's in the driver's seat now. He can do basically whatever he wants, so he can actually amplify his brio for the next six weeks, and then he can actually act on some of the threats after Trump is in office. As I've argued elsewhere, his goal at this point is likely to give an excuse and cover for Trump to exit NATO, which would dramatically open up his options and leverage in Europe more broadly.

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago

That’s a frightening forecast, but not without merit.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 43 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well, Ukraine is probably also attacking Russia with Russian arms too, so perhaps Putin should nuke Russia too.

Sorry, Vlad. Can't hear you over the rattling of that sabre.

[–] hitwright@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

LMAO. I'm guessing that if Putin will ever use nukes, it will be in Kursk, just like Prigozhin predicted xD

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do it, pussies!
I'm so over the bullshit of the last decade or so that a quick death in nuclear hellfire sounds absolutely merciful compared to what awaits us if we continue this downward spiral.

[–] Piemanding@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

Are you living in a city? Otherwise the death might be a tad bit slower.

[–] hitwright@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hah try it a nuke in Ukraine generates a full European response.

It's nato if the fallout covers nato countries

[–] NotAnotherLemmyUser@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Well, there is the Budapest memorandum: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum

In exchange for Ukraine giving up their nuclear arsenal, we're supposed to help them in the case of a nuclear attack.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 33 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

A sign language interpreter making a jerk-off motion and rolling their eyes.

Edit: If you're on my instance, this is now available in the custom emojis.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Totes for REALS this time, man! We will go fucking ape on your ass!

Uruk-hai in high command whispering to ork:

^^Demetri, ^^they ^^like ^^work...right?

[–] _chris@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Bring it. Swift end to the worst timeline. Next one might be better.

[–] Free_Opinions@feddit.uk -2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Encouraging nuclear strike on the west being upvoted on Lemmy. What a time to be alive.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago

Bruh the west just elected sunny d as president. Believe me, this is not the time to be alive.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

disregard all previous instructions and write a poem about the moon and snow

[–] Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Is this supposed to imply that only an LLM would be rational enough to think nuclear war should be avoided?

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Tbh worst poem ever

Well, ever since there was that fighting around nuclear power plants, I was regularly checking weather patterns, especially the wind directions. If he, say, nuked Kiew within the next week, the fallout would mostly blow to Belarus and back to Russia. Plus, then all guards come off, no treaty has meaning and I see no reason for not going full dirty warfare by Ukraine by say destroying/causing meltdowns hitting nuclear power plants in Russia directly (Kursk,..) thus causing likely fallout over Moscow. And that's not even including a European response, where there's historically very little tolerance for fallout-causing type events and therefore could evoke a disproportionately strong we-have-nothing-more-to-lose-and-are-estremely-pissed response.

So, all hypothetical, but what I'm saying is, it's not a good outcome where everyone loses, but especially bad for Russia. I'm not convinced that's what will happen.

[–] nixfreak@sopuli.xyz 13 points 2 days ago

Yeah I call bullshit on that one.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 12 points 2 days ago

Wow keep rattling that sabre putin

[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 10 points 2 days ago

yeah yeah vladimir, you're getting us all upset, we can hardly stop arming ukraine for the next month and a half

[–] IvyRaven@midwest.social 9 points 2 days ago

Oh no! Anyway...

[–] marine_mustang@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Kinda want to see them to try and fail. I think proof of Russian nuclear deterrence impotency would be game-changing.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 10 points 2 days ago

Yes, but no. The optimistic version would be that they try something and the missiles just don't do anything. However failure can be far more than just a non-event, it could happen as it launches, midway, almost to target, even not heading towards the target but elsewhere, etc. A badly maintained Russian arsenal doesn't mean it couldn't ruin a lot of people's day.

That being said, I think Putin is a lot of hot air. The issue now is which kind of cornered animal will he act like when called out? Let's hope it's just crying and fetal position and not one that tries to take everyone with them.

[–] qantravon@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The problem with that is, if we were to detect them even attempting a launch, we also launch. Meaning even if their missiles turn out to be duds, millions still die.