this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
567 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19118 readers
2872 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

“He wants to be seen as having say in everything (even if he doesn’t),” one person in Trump’s orbit said.

Elon Musk’s growing influence in Donald Trump’s orbit is reportedly irritating members of the former president’s inner circle.

Since his efforts helped secure Trump’s reelection, Musk has been highly visible at Mar-a-Lago, taking credit for Trump’s victory and acting as if he’s a “co-president.”

Musk has joined key diplomatic calls and even attempted to broker peace with Iran.

Despite his appointment to lead the Department of Government Efficiency, some close to Trump feel Musk’s overreach and need for attention may jeopardize his position, as Trump dislikes sharing the spotlight.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 92 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (5 children)

Musk has joined key diplomatic calls and even attempted to broker peace with Iran.

That's a pretty clear violation of the Logan Act. Gettin' blue from holding my breath over here.

[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 39 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I'm sure the judiciary is gonna take care of it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm sure Gutless Garland will get right on it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NeoToasty@kbin.melroy.org 178 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It's going to be 4 years of basically watching all of these imbeciles gnaw at eachother while everyone else's quality of life just dies around them. Lovely.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Meanwhile, in the Democratic Party headquarters...

"At least the economy is doing well."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 71 points 6 days ago

Republicans: "Billionaires are just better than everyone else and we should all get out of their way and hand them the keys to everything for the betterment of all mankind."

Republicans After Being Forced to Spend One (1) Week Around Elon Musk: "No, shit, wait, these guys are fucking idiots!"

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 29 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Trump has promised a cabinet position to every insufferable asshole in the country who insists that everyone accept their own fringe views and talks over anyone who disagrees, while also knowing nothing about what they're talking about. This is gonna be funny to watch, but painful to experience.

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 110 points 6 days ago (3 children)

remember: First Lady Elon Musk

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 78 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Secret Service codename: X-wife

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I had predicted this a while back, in that enabling Trump meant victory for the GOP, but the total erosion of Conservative values. This is clear in that any career politician will likely cede power to a bunch of nutjobs or meme lords with money.

They can either shut up and let Trump do his thing (lol), or they can dig their heels in and fight his decisions from within, grinding government to a halt (also lol). Either way, it's a win for most, because in the long term the right will bail after Trump and leave a party so weak that it probably won't be able to fight off the memory of Trump. He'll never endorse a candidate that's not himself, especially if the GOP blocks him. His rabid fan base will either die out, or go third-party because the GOP is "too woke" or something.

[–] a9cx34udP4ZZ0@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

because in the long term the right will bail after Trump and leave a party so weak that it probably won’t be able to fight off the memory of Trump

Look at this optimist still assuming there's going to be another election and that a republican party actually matters. The supreme court has already ruled he can't be held liable for anything he does while president if it's an "official act" - if you think he won't try "officially" ending the public choosing the next president, you might be in for a rude awakening.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 76 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

All of the people swirling around in the sewage that is donvict's thugs are probably pissing off each other, because all of them are Karens, FFS.

Even annoying AF people get annoyed by other annoying assholes...

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 26 points 5 days ago

The only good part of the Trump regime will be watching them infight as we all go up in flames.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 52 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Oh man I can't wait for this knot of over-torqued springs to explode apart into pieces. Too bad the shrapnel will probably kill us all.

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 30 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Yeah, one part of the prediction and fears raised about the republicans is it gives them far too much credit to actually run a government.

They have held the house and the Senate before and then been crippled by infighting as with slim majoroties it only takes a few people to hold everyone hostage.

Some of Trumps nominations may not get through the Republican controlled Congress.

People seem to forget the republicans controlled all 3 parts of government in 2016 and didn't get far. Yes they managed some significant things but tax cuts and supreme Court nominations are the main successes.

This time Trump is making batshit crazy nominations which are likely to divide their own party in Congress.

Gaetz nomination is particularly bad as he's hated by a lot of Republican law makers. There are likely enough republicans who actually care about the legal system that his nomination will not get through. If it does get through then it'll be a sign of how bad things can be. But it's likely it will not get through and just sow seeds of discord between Trump and some of the republicans in Congress, poisoning more attempts to change things.

I predict one hell of a shit show over the next 2 years, but probably not from what they do - instead from what they fail to do and the recriminations that follow. All those Republican law makers telling themselves that Trump is diminished, less of a threat, and that they can control him are in for a hell of a ride.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Trumps administration will likely start out with a lot of power hungry egomaniac freaks, and then with its very high turnover, trump loyalists will be filtered through, like they did in their first term.

Competence doesn't really matter.

[–] 5in1k@lemm.ee 25 points 5 days ago (2 children)

A less endearing Dwight Schrute

[–] Chekhovs_Gun@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

Assistant to the regional dictator

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 32 points 5 days ago

I'm looking forward to 4 years of great and annoying articles like this

[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 29 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Wouldn't it be awesome if they had a big punch-up?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 33 points 6 days ago

Didn't see this coming from about 136 miles away. Oh no...

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 53 points 6 days ago (5 children)

I forgot there were going to be potentially 3 CEOs in the Whitehouse. They're going to get under each other's skin like you wouldn't believe. We're still fucked but the infighting should be quite enjoyable.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 26 points 6 days ago (1 children)

As a European, I'm here with a bucket of popcorn in one hand, enjoying the shit show. I'm of course scared for what will happen, and the consequences will impact the entire planet, but since I have absolutely nothing I can do about it, the enjoyment will suffice.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Metz@lemmy.world 40 points 6 days ago (7 children)

has joined key diplomatic calls and even attempted to broker peace with Iran.

I have to stop reading the news here. I can feel the aneurysm growing in my head.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 51 points 6 days ago

It’ll be the first time in his life he is not the boss. That’ll likely lead to a problem.

[–] MaxPow3r11@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Elon Musk Is Pissing Off Everyone

ftfy

[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 23 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Trump should just shit his pants every time Elon shows up.

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago

What makes you think he doesn't?

[–] Kite@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 days ago

Even ignoring the fact that he's a billionaire and that's what got him where he is, Musk's personality seems to be such that he is innately annoying as fuck. He'll always have yes-men around him because of his money, but I do wonder just how long everyone else in his current political circle are going to tolerate him. I'm hoping he'll be his own annoying downfall.

[–] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 30 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Trapezoid Musk wants to steal the attention away from Trump. He will never allow that. I pray they will clash at each other

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] elrik@lemmy.world 28 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Please fire him. Preferably into the sun, but I'll accept simply out of any position in government.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 12 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I really hope they throw him under the bus, and then later they can fire him and blame him for anything that goes wrong.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gedhrel@lemmy.world 30 points 6 days ago

He doesn't want to be co-president. He's a founder of the USA.

[–] HorreC@lemmy.world 25 points 6 days ago (1 children)

When you are fucking the bosses wife, you get to do anything you want.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago (1 children)

When you are fucking the boss~~es wife~~, you get to do anything you want.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hark@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Hoping this results in real negative consequences for once in musk's life.

[–] WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

Chance of him learning for said negative experience: 0%

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SlippiHUD@lemmy.world 34 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Are we going to see Trump Admin Churn before he even takes office!?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] madjo@feddit.nl 13 points 5 days ago

Sucks to be them.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 25 points 6 days ago (7 children)

I'm gonna call bullshit on this. For years now, I've been reading articles just like this one, and at the end of the day, nobody that could change anything did a fucking thing. It's just posturing and means nothing.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] bender223@lemmy.today 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

He's a genius billionaire, so we should always listen to what he says, no matter how stupid it is.

/s

[–] auzy@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

Yeah. Like that shitty sub he built

At least unlike the cave divers, when he calls people in Trump's team a pedo this time when they ignore him, he might actually be right

load more comments
view more: next ›