this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
192 points (96.6% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2434 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 111 points 1 week ago (11 children)

All the people who were screeching to abandon Harris because of Gaza seem awfully quiet now

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 66 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Gosh but I heard that all genocide is equal and Biden is literally the devil. Do you mean that having a meaningful impact on whether Palestinians live or die was worth swallowing my pride and voting for Harris? But isn't my ideal that no Palestinian should die more important than actually saving the lives of Palestinians?

/s I absolutely can't fucking stand people who were unable to realize that less harm would, in fact, be less harmful.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You say "unable to realize", I say "intentionally pushed a false narrative to increase voter apathy".

Especially since many of them refused to engage any discussion on how much worse Trump would be.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 days ago

It's a combination of both. Lots of useful idiots. Just see that thing AOC did to find out why people would split the vote with her and Trump.

People in this country are straight up dangerously stupid.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 31 points 1 week ago (13 children)

I have a feeling a lot of them were not American. The bot farms are quiet now because they got what they wanted.

[–] freeman@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

Too bad the actual fascist Americans who elected Trump are still with you. It's always someone else's fault not America's.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well it's not like Biden/Harris actually tried for a ceasefire. There's really not much change other than the quiet part being said out loud.

[–] jumjummy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not much change yet… like I said in another thread, let’s just save this comment and revisit it in 2025, shall we?

[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The escalations we're going to see over the coming months were going to happen with a Republican as President or Democrat. The past 13 months has shown Israel can get away with virtually whatever they want. They were never intending on stopping regardless of the outcome of the election.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah that cease fire Biden negotiated was way better!

Oh, wait.

[–] CityPop@lemmy.today 10 points 1 week ago

Don’t try to pop their cope bubble.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Are they? I see the comments still full of them.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (17 children)

Nah, they're clamoring for Biden to hurry up and stop shipment of arms to Israel and get the ceasefire some before Trump gets into office. Too little to late guys, Israel won't care, won't do shit now that they know trump won.

[–] CityPop@lemmy.today 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

We’ve been clamoring for it since Biden first bypassed congress to directly send them weapons and money after October.

Israel has never cared so far and gotten away with everything, so nothing has changed there.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean what's there to say? Yeah we know Trump fucking sucks what do you want them to do? There's barely anything to say when he hasn't done anything ywt.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He already said he's giving Israel a blank cheque. Not sure how that's "nothing"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] themoken@startrek.website 25 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Everyone pointing at people that didn't vote for Harris over Gaza like this is some gotcha moment are totally missing the point. If Gaza was your primary concern (like if you and your family are Palestinian perhaps) neither candidate was going to do anything for you at all. Harris paid a tiny bit of lip service to Gaza two days before the election after months of shutting down and ignoring everyone demanding ceasefire.

I voted Harris purely out of harm reduction, but she offered nothing to anyone on the left. The DNC assumes everyone that is queer or bipoc or a woman owes them their vote and then used the platform to court non-existent center right voters.

But nah, let's pretend that Harris, who took Biden's positions wholesale, would have done something different as if they weren't currently in power. Let's pretend they would have done something to restore abortion rights too, or tackle climate change or raise the minimum wage when they're so busy trying to get fascist votes and not piss off the coporate donor class.

The Democratic party needs to be rebuilt from scratch or not rebuilt at all.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Everyone pointing at people that didn’t vote for Harris over Gaza like this is some gotcha moment are totally missing the point.

Yes, yes. We get your "point". Harris's policy on Gaza was bad, so of course the clear solution was to hand the Presidency to someone who would make it worse. To send a message.

Good job, guys. Your message was loud and clear. I'm sure that in 2028, Democrats might have a slightly more pro-Palestine agenda. Maybe. Until they realize there's a hell of a lot more Jewish voters that would be even more pissed off. Lesson learned. I'm sure the people of Palestine who will lose their land, their families, and their lives between now and then will take solace in knowing that you sacrificed their lives on their behalf to send a political message in a country 5000 miles away. I'm sure that's exactly what they wanted.

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago

Except that basically every angle except geopolitics, MIC profits, and AIPAC money, pointed towards curbing Israel/Bibi as a a good move. Even a free and independent Palestine has supermajority support - from a Nov-Oct poll of American Jewish voters:

Jewish voters… priorities include a major speech proposing a Palestinian state and diplomatic relations between Israel and Arab states (72 percent) and increasing humanitarian aid to Palestinians (71 percent). There is also significant support (66 percent) for sanctioning Israeli ministers Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich for aiding violent settler attacks against Palestinians.

Emphasis mine. Review the data if you care, but the continuation of Bidens policies was a huge self own. Resolve the issue and Republicans/Russian messaging of ‘Genocide Joe’ falls flat.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

that Harris, who took Biden's positions wholesale

Except for the instances where she moved further to the right, like on capital gains tax.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Something, something Republicans are peacemakers.

[–] ASDraptor@lemmy.autism.place 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, you can't be at war against an enemy that doesn't exist. If there are no more palestinians, you can't be at war with them.

Peace through annihilation

[–] Bacano@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Let them who are most pro-war get to fight on the front lines.

Idc if it's a one sided genocide, this fluffy politician who wouldn't last a 3 mile ruck should get to experience wtf he's actually advocating.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

lol what the fuck else could anyone expect? He’s an invertebrate.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Something, something, "Genocide Joe", argle bargle, bOtHsIdEs, people!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Proposed Secretary of State is against Gaza cease fire.

You reap what you sow, kids!

[–] CityPop@lemmy.today 11 points 1 week ago

The continued ongoing genocide of the Palestinians as materially aided by US politicians on both sides of the aisle?

load more comments
view more: next ›