this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
112 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19120 readers
3209 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ExhaleSmile@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

While I assume the article is referring to House, Senate, and presidency; it's really legislative, executive, and judgicial

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago

Theoretically the judicial should be considered nonpartisan and objective when talking about this but we know that's a load of crap now.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Yes. The confusion is in the wording, not the message itself.

We already know they have the presidency and SCOTUS. The third piece of the trifecta is Congress. They already have the Senate. We’re just waiting on confirmation that they have the House as well.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The sad thing is, it works for both.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

When they talk about a "trifecta" in this context it means the presidency, the Senate and the House. That applies to both the national and State governments.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Those are the three branches of the U.S. government, but in this context, they mean the three institutions required to pass legislation; a bill must go through both the House and the Senate and then be signed by the President to become a law. If Democrats had taken one of those institutions, they could have slowed the Republicans' agenda..

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And they'll still blame Democrats for everything that goes wrong.

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Let them. They need to experience the world they apparently want, and there's nothing we can do to reverse course at this point ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh goody. Unchecked power.

[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 26 points 1 week ago

Bad for america, bad for the world.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 week ago

They will control everything. Americans handed the fascists complete control over the legal system as well as the judicial system. Democracy is finished. There will be no free elections going forward. They made their choice.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

President and Senate are already called:

In the House it's 216 R / 207 D with 218 needed for majority. We likely won't know the full result for several days.

12 races left to call.

CA 9 - Leaning Democratic
CA 21 - Leaning Democratic
CA 47 - Leaning Democratic
ME 2 - Leaning Democratic
OH 9 - Leaning Democratic
OR 5 - Leaning Democratic - Called by local media.

AK 1 - Leaning Republican
AZ 6 - Leaning Republican
CA 13 - Leaning Republican
CA 41 - Leaning Republican
CA 45 - Leaning Republican
IA 1 - Leaning Republican

Looks like it's going to end up 222 R to 213 D which is +2 for the Republicans and +1 for the Democrats, which makes sense because there had been 3 vacancies.

[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why were there so many uncontested seats in Alabama? I know Democrats probably couldn't win but they should at least put forward candidates.

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Apparently even when they have millions of dollars more than their opponents, the DNC refuses to do anything they perceive as wasting money.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 5 points 1 week ago

Unless that something is diverting all their funds into Texas.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's for the best at this point, they own everything and everything that happens is on them and no one but them. trump can't say, "oh the House is why I haven't been able to do this or that thing I said I would do."

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Has the truth ever stopped him or his supporters? There's going to be 1984 levels of propaganda happening.

[–] Fuzzy_Red_Panda@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

Truth, hypocrisy, and owning up to anything has never mattered to them.

I mean this was pretty much known early on. It would have been quite the hail mary for the dems to grab what was still unsure based on leanings.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Yikes. They will do so much now.