this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
887 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19120 readers
3209 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Honestly call or email the Democratic party offices and voice that you one hundred percent agree with Sanders.

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 1 week ago

Did that Wednesday past.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

Honestly call or email the Democratic party offices and voice that you one hundred percent agree with Sanders.

https://democrats.org/contact-us/

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago

Where has this version of Bernie been for the last 4 years?

[–] Audacious@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

All sides are using Bernie to bash Democrats, and I don't like it.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

All sides are using Bernie to bash Democrats, and I don’t like it.

On what basis would you not like this?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Cunt... the American unfriendly version.

[–] sumguyonline@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Pelosi is Democrat leadership. She is responsible for the supreme court running rampant, kamala, and the war on drugs still being a thing. She deserves to be hung as a traitor to the republic. Furious. We are furious at her. I'm angry at my dog for pissing on the couch. I'm furious at Pelosi.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (9 children)

You do know Pelosi stepped down from her leadership position almost exactly 2 years ago, right?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If you start hanging people trying to run the government no good people will want to be in the government.

it is a feedback loop for national bloodshed.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I frankly think that while Bernie should be right, he's not. His strategy would have also failed, though I'd rather that have been the attempt.

Simple fact of the matter is that out of 10 major countries with elections this year, all the incumbents lost. Didn't matter whether they were left or right or whatever, they lost. Democrats were doomed by being the incumbents at a time when just so many are unhappy with how things currently are, and people are eager to change everything for a shot. Between having the pandemic become endemic everywhere, economies struggling to digest the massive COVID stimulus, supply chains still off due to both recovering from shutdowns and war, and just the overall situation in Ukraine and Gaza, there's a lot for people to want a change of course, and they don't know specifically how this all could get fixed.

Even if they went all-in on more leftist policies, most voters won't see beyond the 'D' and know 'D' is what we had today, therefore 'R' must be attached to the answer. A critical mass of the electorate either can not or will not critically consider the respective platforms and instead just decide based on 'keep the same' or 'change course'.

Meanwhile, in political circles, everyone is talking like the specifics and strategies made this huge difference or that huge difference and what it means, when the fact is likely that this result was pretty much a given no matter what.

I hadn't thought about it in those terms, but this makes a lot of sense. Especially in a 2-party system the election is inevitably going to be a vibe check on the status quo as much as it is a specific election focusing on specific candidates and policies. I'd like to look more closely at the margins to get a feel for whether the Republicans could have run a ham sandwich and still been successful as opposed to the specific appeal of Trumpism.

Not that that changes how rough the next 4 years are going to get for a lot of people.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›