Until we are able to travel way faster than what we can do now, I think itβs more feasible to build in space. Lots of implications for long term effects on human bodies though. Most ideal is a wormhole to an identical planet to earth so humans wonβt need to adapt.
Asklemmy
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
The odds of an exactly identical planet existing naturally are very slim. The only way to get that is some kind of terraforming. Or we evolve to adapt to our new environments. Which could mean that humans could split out into multiple successor species.
We should stay fucking put until we figure out how to end greed and racism once and for all
Any ideas?
If we are capable of doing one, then we can do both.
yes.
if we want to become a true space faring species resilient to all that the universe can throw at us we will need both
Both! All three!
THE YEAR IS UNIVERSAL CENTURY 0079
C) Undersea habitat domes!
Colonizing Antarctica would be more reasonable than that.