Technology

59641 readers

2620 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

1524

Linus Torvalds reckons AI is ‘90% marketing and 10% reality’ (www.tomshardware.com)

submitted 4 weeks ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

236 comments fedilink hide all child comments

(page 5) 42 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] ntn888@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 weeks ago

I dunno about him; but genuinely I'm excited about AI. Blows my mind each passing day ;)

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

He is correct. It is mostly people cashing out on stuff that isn't there.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

it is basically like how self improvement folks are using quantum

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 weeks ago

That makes sense. He's old enough and close enough thematically to have seen a few of these tech hype cycles.

[–] Alpha71@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago

"duh."

[–] BenchpressMuyDebil@szmer.info -5 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Nice replacement topic after the maintainer drama last week

load more comments (1 replies)

[+] kitnaht@lemmy.world -67 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (32 children)

Honestly, he's wrong though.

I know tons of full stack developers who use AI to GREATLY speed up their workflow. I've used AI image generators to put something I wanted into the concept stage before I paid an artist to do the work with the revisions I wanted that I couldn't get AI to produce properly.

And first and foremost, they're a great use in surfacing information that is discussed and available, but might be buried with no SEO behind it to surface it. They are terrible at deducing things themselves, because they can't 'think', or coming up with solutions that others haven't already - but so long as people are aware of those limitations, then they're a pretty good tool to have.

It's a reactionary opinion when people jump to the 'but they're stealing art!' -- isn't your brain also stealing art when it's inspired by others art? Artists don't just POOF, and have the capability to be artists. They learn slowly over time, using others as inspiration or as training to improve. That's all stable diffusors do - just a lot faster.

[–] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 weeks ago

Let me guess. Dumped by an art girl and anxious about the $600 you invested?

load more comments (30 replies)

load more comments