this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
1239 points (92.3% liked)

Science Memes

11130 readers
3052 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 4 weeks ago

In the begining, was uranium, and the uranium was not stable?

[–] Erasmus@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago

Yeah this doesn’t do squat to prove or disprove anything to these nutters.

I’ve done the same with a variety of other things and you will get told the same thing:

God put it here.

Thing is you cannot argue with the above statement because it falls into that sort of argument you used to have when you were a child when the other kid would say ‘Nyah! Last word!!’ or ‘I can’t hear you!!’

[–] jenny_ball@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mindaika@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

There’s bread from 14,000 years ago

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 weeks ago

Look I don't like them either, but you can't refer to crusty bishops that way

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 5 points 3 weeks ago

I'm not siding with the 4000 year old earth argument, but that is a weak counterargument.

Lead was created by dying stars that long predate the Earth.

[–] heavyboots@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 weeks ago

Dude is gonna come back at him with the first mention of lead in the bible and say, no this is where God created lead, lol.

nO ThAT’s jUSt gOD tEStiNg yOuR FAiTh

🤦‍♂️

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago

"Whatever! Pssshhh!"

[–] lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

This would mean that there was more uranium around millions and billions of years in the past so why isn't there any evidence of prehistoric nukes in the fossil record

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

If uranium-238 can be Fused in a star why couldn’t lead be Fused directly and in tern all the elements in between.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›