this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
461 points (96.2% liked)

politics

19132 readers
4015 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 233 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Once Biden stepped aside and endorsed Harris, Trump's entire campaign strategy was upended, making him the oldest candidate on the campaign trail and exposing faults in his logic.

Wtf, "exposing faults in his logic"? Why do the media continue to do everything they can to portray Trump as a reasonable man making logical plans for how best to govern?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 75 points 1 week ago (47 children)
[–] Lon3star@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago

Just like the LA Times owner refusing to let the Editors endorse Harris

load more comments (46 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A combination of "The owner of the company is a right winger" and "We need to make both sides look equally incompetent, even when one side is shitting himself and the other side has actual policy."

Used to it was just the latter, now we also have the former.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Hey now, to be fair it's just "persistent anal leakage".

Looking forward to MAGA folks bringing patriotic Chinese-made black butt towels to his rallies.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zolidus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Do you mean Drowsy Donald?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 87 points 1 week ago (5 children)

OK so I don’t have Twitter and I have social media blocked basically so I wanted to see the ad, right? I went to YouTube to pull it up.

It was really bizarre - if you search for “Harris ad trump sleeping” you get about 100 - OK 20 of the exact same clip from any number of local TV stations (most of the Fox) where Trump claims Harris is sleeping. And one - exactly one - MSNBC clip, which runs for 12 minutes talking about “exhausted” trump, and doesn’t even show the Harris ad. The Harris ad did not appear in the search at all.

Now I’m not “signed in“ there, I don’t have cookies or anything so I’m just some random browser showing up asking to see the Harris ad and seeing 90% Trump ads.

I don’t know what else going on at YouTube, other than it’s awful and worse than ever, and appears to be subsumed with Trump crap.

[–] LucidNightmare@lemm.ee 45 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I tried finding the Harris interview on Fox there, and just like you, there were so many videos uploaded by randos that could have easily been manipulated, so I just went to the actual Faux website to watch it. Google wants Trump to win so they can buy their way to total dominance.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Not just that, but I was watching some video about i dunno, some kinda hardware, or something - nothing even particularly recent or popular - and the comments underneath it were so obviously and horribly bots. They all used the exact same words, they all used the exact same phrasing, and they all had different user names. Just one after the other, probably 100 of them

So I think YouTube has abandoned attempts to make it good - or even usable - probably for profit reasons. Enter russia4trump

[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Basically in the same situation as you, but I follow a mastodon clone of the KamalaHQ xitter account. If I share the mastodon link, it takes you to the xitter post to watch the video, but in the mastodon app, it plays directly.

FWIW: https://bird.makeup/users/kamalahq/statuses/1848764783132053811

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Good point - but it didn’t work in my mastodon app (it linked to the tweet but as I say I have that blocked). I did read up on the Kamala tag though, so thanks for the pointer!

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Every comicsands.com post is just a chain of orange, "Privacy Badger has replaced this X (Twitter) widget" boxes for me.

Thanks Privacy Badger. Do better Comicsands.

[–] JWBananas@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The video was a tweet. You won't find it searching for an ad. It was embedded in the article.

[–] kablammy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Something must be wrong with the site at the moment, as I don't see any video in the article. The rendering is also a bit fucked up.

[–] JWBananas@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] kablammy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Thanks. I saw a bunch of those "- (@)" throughout the page with lots of whitespace around them so I guessed they might be where embedded content were supposed to be. Maybe my pihole is blocking them.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why would I not find it searching for an ad on youtube? I’ve found lots of ads on youtube in the before-times.

[–] JWBananas@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Was it a video? I hear they have those on youtube. The article made it sound like there was audio and video together, not just text.

And anyway isn’t it called an “x” now? I’mma x all my friends to find out.

[–] JWBananas@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Was it a video? I hear they have those on youtube.

Remember when boomers thought Internet Explorer (or maybe AOL) was "the Internet"? This reeks of that.

Here, I'll make it easier for you:

https://imgur.com/a/bDzhSJN

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Cool thanks!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 63 points 1 week ago

Saved you a click: they shared the video of him nodding off but added a lullaby.

[–] karl_chungus@lemm.ee 46 points 1 week ago
[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That poopy diaper is so nice and warm it puts you right to sleep.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How dare you make me visualize that

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago
[–] buycurious@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Zolidus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

LOL remember when Sleepy Joe was the decrepit old man challenging young, virile Rambo Trump?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gork@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

She should hit Trump back with some nicknames like what Trump does to other people.

Sleepy Don. Meatball Don.

[–] Zolidus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Drowsy Don to quote buycurious's reply

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 2 points 1 week ago (6 children)

This is getting out of hand, guys.

[–] zzx@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Ugh I really wish we could avoid astroturfing or exclusively political accounts

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 1 week ago

Should have a temp ban on any accounts under 30 days until after the election.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›