this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
804 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

58808 readers
4449 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 5paceThunder@lemmy.ca 29 points 2 days ago

Lol, Elon is the new Trump, what a mooch. Take away message, Never do business with these types, you will never get paid.

[–] Baggins@feddit.uk 88 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That's how his Department Of Government Efficiency will save billions.

[–] interurbain1er@sh.itjust.works 37 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Seems aligned with Trump's habit of shafting his sub-contractors.

[–] shinratdr@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 days ago

Which is what Trump wants, as he also publicly admits he just doesn’t pay bills if he doesn’t feel like it.

Looking forward to all the lawsuits between the two should he lose.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 170 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Never give these rich assholes credit unless there is an airtight contract for payment.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 155 points 2 days ago (2 children)

There is no such thing as an airtight contract when dealing with Musk. He simply ignores it until you sue.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 116 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Same thing as Trump.

Doesn't matter how perfect your contract is, as long as they can afford to fight the lawsuit longer than you you're gonna lose.

You'd think people would learn to not contract with these assholes at all.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 15 points 2 days ago

You just have to work in legal costs to anything you do. Call it an asshole tax

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Or you just...stop providing the service?

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (10 children)

“The components used to build the products are largely unique to the products, resulting in long lead times for ordering such component parts from suppliers,” and Twitter must give “written approval for Wiwynn to purchase the necessary components to manufacture the customer products…and expressly assumed liabilities for the procurement costs.”

So basically they were bespoke servers that are great for Twitter, custom designed, and definitely aren’t easy to just resell elsewhere, so because Twitter isn’t paying, the IT company is eating the loss right now

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 37 points 2 days ago

Never give these rich assholes credit ~~unless there is an airtight contract for payment~~.

[–] pandapoo@sh.itjust.works 38 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Cash on delivery is extremely rare in the business world, especially when dealing with enterprise customers. While I have no doubt many of Twitter's vendors have recently switched to COD, that is not the norm.

These types of relationships typically work on anywhere from 30 to 90 day terms, depending on the vendor, client, and their history.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Payment up front, in non negotiable bearer bonds.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Strip "Leon" of his US citizenship, use a court order to take the money from his account and ship his Dork MAGA ass off to Moscow or Johannesburg.

[–] Tire@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Could you imagine how upset Republicans would be if some random Mexican immigrant used $61m of resources and didn’t pay? But if it’s a rich white guy that owes that much they are fine with it.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago
[–] uis@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago

off to Moscow

Only if China or America are willing to receive Pu's ass.

[–] fubarx@lemmy.ml 77 points 2 days ago
[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 115 points 2 days ago (2 children)

“Your Honor, the board voted to pay this guy a salary of nearly that amount - per day. If it would please the court, fuck this guy and the board and please make them pay their bills.”

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

"Your honor, rather than pay his outstanding debts, this shiftless f***wit used 75 million dollars to fund a SuperPAC to bother people at their homes for the benefit of the Trump campaign."

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Different board. That was Tesla, not Twitter.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 51 points 2 days ago

Paying bills is for poor people. Rich people don’t need to do that. How would they stay rich?

[–] _core@sh.itjust.works 88 points 2 days ago (7 children)
[–] rsuri@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

X/Twitter has its own data centers, this is for physical equipment under X's control. They need to get a judgment (which the article indicates they're working on) before they can do anything. Presumably after months to years of litigation they can then repossess the servers, but then X would probably at the last minute pay the bill.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 days ago

They ship servers to customers, don't think they have access anymore.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] AlphaOmega@lemmy.world 59 points 2 days ago

Didn't he just donate 75 mil towards fascism? But can't pay his bills...

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Soooo noone here even read the article? Just see Elon and start shitting everywhere? The company suing X was dealing with Twitter before Elon. There was no purchasing contract in place when the suing company placed the $20 million dollar order they are claiming is all custom made and cant be recouped, "the social media platform had not made any firm purchase order when the server dealer went ahead with its purchases and deliveries."

How about we read an article before we start spewing shit everywhere?

[–] exasperation@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There was no purchasing contract in place when the suing company placed the $20 million dollar order they are claiming is all custom made and cant be recouped, "the social media platform had not made any firm purchase order when the server dealer went ahead with its purchases and deliveries."

You're leaving out that the paragraph you're summarizing starts off with "X claims that."

One side says there was a contract. The other side says it wasn't firmed up yet into a binding contract. Neither side has come forward with their evidence.

Also, Wiwynn is also suing for negligent misrepresentation and promissory estoppel, which don't require a contract.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

Wtf "cant be recouped" means for servers?

[–] Xatolos@reddthat.com 20 points 1 day ago (5 children)

When you read the article, it also points to another article that goes further into this case.

...in 2014 it contracted with Twitter to provide "unique, custom-designed IT infrastructure products including rack solutions."...

Seems it was already approved in 2014 for such a long-term relationship in writing. It seems that Elon just didn't want to pay for it even though Twitter was contractual bound to pay.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There was no purchasing contract in place when the suing company placed the $20 million dollar order

You think that companies just slap down 20mil without a contract in place?

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hahaha yeah otherwise they wouldn't be trying to sue to recoup losses. It happens all the time in sales. I can't even tell you the amount of times I have told new sales reps, I will not place anticipatory PO's without payment confirmation or full compliance with not just the purchase order's parameters for payment on large orders but also an email or otherwise documented acknowledgment of our sales order confirmation. Especially in any case where:

  1. The sales rep has a PO from customer but no payment confirmation/information OR

  2. If it's an order over, let's say $10,000 OR

  3. If it's the first time customer is purchasing from us and they want to make a blanket order OR

  4. If they're an international customer placing ANY orders over $500, or have seperate countries for billing and shipping address, or they're shipping to a country on our "fuck shipping to these countries" list

All those scenarios happen and happen often. Theyre not 100% of nepharious lost revenue cases but I'd say they make up 80-90% of the shit companies have sitting on a warehouse top shelf. Only getting moved to make room for other stuff.

Any business doing fabrications or custom fuckin anything, also will 100% of the time have a signed drawing or print, payment in full before it's released to production floor, usually a +/- 5% runoff or shorting stipulation for any qty over 1,000-3,000 custom anything, and constant communication through out the entire process.

For this exact very real very common shit storm.

So and so's cnc machine broke down we can only make 1,000 of the 10,000 you ordered.

It was a government contract to redo the electrical work at Governor Cuomo's house, how should I know he was going to be removed from office?

Everything this lawsuit outlines, fuckkn screams new business, 1st large contract. All the need is one email, one purchase order, fuck even just a sales order from Twitter and they wouldn't ever make it close to a court house before the Twitter boardmembers looked at the liability, the legal costs and the very slim liklihood they would come out better than if they paid the $20 million. And anyone who argues that $20 Million is enough to try and skip out on and risk letting it go to court has no fucking idea to the quantifiable difference between $20 million and $8-$20 Billion (what im guessing Twitter is still worth assuming it was about $40B when Elon bought and estimates have it between 50% and 80% the value when it sold. Even at the middle $14B, $20M is only 0.14285714% of $14B. No that's not a mistake the decimal is where it should be lol. Check it by multiplying $14B*0.0014285714

[–] Entropywins@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Wywinn is a 12 year old $7 billion in revenue cloud infrastructure provider (originally a subsidiary of Wistron Corp) and represents 10-15% of worldwide server procurement...they are pretty serious and come from a very serious business background.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They should seize and sell his private jet.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You misspelled "harvest" and "organs".

[–] swab148@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Harvest his private organs? No one wants those.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›