this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
918 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

59578 readers
3168 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] capital@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Storing that much data on Wasabi would cost about $1,700/mo.

If it’s that important, rent a VPS, connect Rclone to Google Drive and Wasabi, and transfer.

Even 5 Gb/s would get it done in under 5 days and VPSes are usually faster than that.

I hope someone has already made this suggestion to him.

Edit: Forgot about the daily download limit.. ugh. What a pain in the ass.

[–] _dev_null@lemmy.zxcvn.xyz 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

AWS S3 would be about $3.2k/month, or do Glacier for about $250. I doubt any individual alone is touching 250TB worth of files, so deep freeze seems like a good option. Then mirror into a different region for 2x the price and peace of mind.

[–] capital@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Retrieval times get tricky with Glacier though.

I’d hate to be working on a story, especially with a deadline (if he has those), and be forced to wait on Glacier to retrieve a file.

Hope it’s the one you need on the first try too…

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] throws_lemy@lemmy.nz 18 points 11 months ago

I'm not trying to blame him, but more than 200 TB of data on cloud storage? Holy cow, I wouldn't even trust it to store more than 5 GB of data.

[–] cyd@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

If the company was run by a hallucinating AI it couldn't be any flakier.

[–] yonerboner@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago (5 children)

I had this happen to me. They haven’t threated to delete my account yet. I have about 50TB. I built a 170TB (raw) NAS for $2000 and transferred it all, only took about a week or so to download everything on my gig fiber.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm surprised they even allowed that much to be uploaded. Even if it is "unlimited", that must be against some sort of fair usage agreement.

If you need to archive over 250TB of data, you should get a tape drive.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Come on, if it's unlimited it's unlimited, not "unlimited but only if you use less than limit"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Laitinlok@lemmy.laitinlok.com 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

https://www.techdirt.com/2023/10/10/journalists-ask-doj-to-stop-treating-url-alterations-as-a-federal-crime/

Idk what you mean by unauthorised access to the video if you gain access to the password of the database or simply it wasn't password protected at all. Simply scrapping the site and reading html files or using the tools from the browser to scan the network connections to find the original footage is not hacking.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 8 points 11 months ago

Where is crystal storage when you need it? 😢

[–] Grofit@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

All people who think this is a good read should Google about the Bitcasa saga, that was a wild ride.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›