this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
6 points (87.5% liked)

Memes

45719 readers
737 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AchillesUltimate@lemy.lol 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not everyone in capitalism is a winner, and that's ok. The big advantage is that the losers are usually offered the opportunity to work and make a living.

The alternative is crossing your fingers and hoping the government (or whatever body is responsible for distributing pay) gives you what you need. If they don't, tough luck, there's nothing you can do about it.

[–] Michal@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

As opposed to under capitalism where you have to cross your fingers and hoping that one of those winners will offer you a job with living wage, while another doesn't charge you an arm and leg for housing.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem is that the biggest "winners" in this case are almost exclusively the people willing to go the furthest to put profits ahead of people, which in a better system would never be incentivized.

[–] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Capitalism is the worst economic system, except for all others which have been tried

[–] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"I went to high school. Hear my wisdom"

[–] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you disagree, feel free to point to a superior alternative which has been demonstrated in reality

[–] BennyHill@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As demonstrated by which socialist country

[–] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 1 year ago

A huge range of them. If you can’t see which ones then that is not something anyone is capable of explaining to you

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe evidence points towards the pyramids being built by paid workers, and I think some even got to be buried in their own smaller pyramids

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Correct, except smaller pyramids, those were also for the kings only, workers building pyramids had their own cementaries iirc.

But knowledge of this fact actually makes this meme even more relatable - the people in it were closer to wage slaves like us.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Correct, conditions of the workers of the Pyramids and Temples

-8 h per day, 6 days a week

-Free housing, food and a small garden for themselves and their families

-Medical assistance and care in sick leave due to illness and accident.

-Exempt from paying taxes

-Care and assistance for the old ex-workers.

(better than today in most countries)

Slaves (mostly prisoners of war and criminals) were naturally also used, but only for basic jobs and assistance. The Pharao knew very well that if he wants a job well done, he cannot get it with slaves and in poor conditions, but with well-cared and happy professionals.

[–] halvar@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Someone do something about political memes on the general meme communities please

[–] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

You want more of them?

[–] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The communist version of this meme has someone with a whip and sword standing behind them and telling them to work for the benefit of the people or die

[–] duderium@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

This is called projection, especially since capitalism itself was built with ongoing slavery and genocide. The only people who should fear communists are the bourgeoisie and their running dogs.

[–] NENathaniel@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Okay hate on capitalism, fair enough

But equating it to literal slavery like we've had in the past (and still have in some parts of the world) seems problematic to me

[–] explodicle@local106.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Experience demonstrates that there may be a slavery of wages only a little less galling and crushing in its effects than chattel slavery, and that this slavery of wages must go down with the other."

— Frederick Douglass

[–] NENathaniel@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I suspect that most other actual slaves would not entirely agree with that sentiment

[–] Gerbler@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Frederick Douglass the famous non-slave

[–] Nevoic@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your original stance was that it is "problematic" to equate them. Do you think it was problematic for Fredrick Douglass to equate them? If not then your original position has to change.

We don't have polling on prior chattel slave views on wage slavery, but since you're making a habit of just going with your gut, I'll do the same. I'd wager most prior chattel slaves would've been more than happy to abolish all forms of slavery (including wage slavery).

[–] NENathaniel@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago

Douglass died in 1895 when the standard of living was wildly lower than what it is today, its not an equivalent comparison

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

we’ve had in the past

we definitely still have slavery in America. Like, in America. Don't get me wrong, there are plenty of companies that outsource their slavery to other countries and then ship the product here so we can pretend it's not made by slaves, but plenty of companies skip the middle man and just use slaves here