this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
539 points (87.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43968 readers
1546 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 8) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] TotallyNotADolphin@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Fallout 4 is a better game than New Vegas.

[โ€“] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 6 points 11 months ago

I suppose everyone is entitled to an opinion, no matter how wrong it is.

load more comments (3 replies)
[โ€“] OnlyAwfulNamesLeft@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Selfishness is coded into us by evolution. It's genetic. Lots of people will agree with me on this.

What I get a lot of pushback on, is that selflessness is the same. It has evolutionary benefits for a familial group, and so gets selected for.

[โ€“] FanonFan@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago

Selfishness may have been selected for tens of millions of years ago in our evolution, but as pre-humans became social animals it's clear that selfless or other-centric thinking became strongly selected for as well. You otherwise couldn't have a species that's almost entirely other-dependent, throughout the whole life but especially for the first 10-15 years of it.

Humans can't sustainably exist outside of a society.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] Moneo@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] recarsion@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

I don't want to get rid of daylight savings, because it's still a better option than keeping either summer or winter time.

Edit: another one: not having kids does not in any way contribute to solving environmental problems, we need MORE young, educated minds who have a chance to figure it out (as terrible as it sounds to push problems on the new generation), and we should ensure that in the event that we do manage to stabilize the situation, we won't instead have fucked up demographics to deal with.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ