this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
1572 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

59578 readers
3168 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frezik@midwest.social 16 points 2 months ago (4 children)

USB in 1996: Let's make one connector that handles everything

USB in 2024: Let's make one connector do thirty different incompatible combinations of things

[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

To be fair, the goal is the same.

  1. Not everyone needs the sheer CPU, power, and costs of a 40 GB/s connection.
  2. Higher wattage chargers cost more
  3. Not everyone needs a USB port that does video out (even if it should be standard now that virtually every new GPU should be compatible)
  4. Even if the CPU and GPU support a feature, the OEM can use a cheaper controller
  5. The controller firmware can lack support for a feature or be buggy

The USB forum can only solve points 4 and 5 without raising costs on the cheapest hardware.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Jikiya@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Handy guide, but this whole USB situation is a cock-up, since it needs the freakin guide in the first place.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Meh, while there really could be less. At least they are all physically compatible. And backwards protocol compatible to the lowest common denominator. Which is a huge step forward.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (10 children)

I think that maybe having two similar lightning bolt symbols that mean different things wasn't the best design decision that the USB guys could have made.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

That meme sucked

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What about red USB-A ports, and USB-C ports with no symbol by them at all (like on phones and desktop PCs)?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I've literally never seen any of these except the top symbol.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Disgracefulone@discuss.online 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Came here disappointed to see no one said anything about Black D inside white P

Edit: yes, I have the humour of a 16 yo

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 months ago

Well, except all the legacy symbols on devices older than current gen.

[–] rolling_resistance@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The standard might be complicated if you want the specifics, but for everyday use it's incredibly simple, and I love it. The number of times I needed this information is 1, even though most of my devices, including an external monitor, are USB-C.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Fuctangle@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

Why not label the ports and cables with:

  • 10Gb/s
  • 2.1Amps
  • 1080p at 60hz

It's future proof and doesn't need a decoder manual other than basic literacy. It can be in whatever language the fucking keyboard is. If you want to be redundant but even more clear:

  • Universal Serial Bus -> (this hole right here)
  • Speed: 40Gb/s
  • Power: 2.4Amps
  • Audio/Video: 4K at 120Hz or 8K at 30Hz
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] GlenRambo@jlai.lu 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Why use more words when less is easier.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›