this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

News

23367 readers
2658 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vladmech@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Living that DINK life and still having trouble keeping out of debt. I can't imagine having to cover for kids, too.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

choosing

Is doing so much heavy lifting in that headline.

Might as well be "More Titanic passengers choosing life rafts to ocean liners"

[–] AwkwardTurtle@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Because we can't afford our own lives, how are we supposed to support children? Not even taking into account for how absolutely fucked we all are. Our planet is dying, how can we bring children into this world if it's all falling apart?

[–] G020B@lemmy.zip 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

But you can't forget that your children can save the planet, if your generation won't.

[–] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Man, fuck them negative votes. Humans do best understand pressure. We need humans to solve this crisis because, humans manufactured it. We make more humans and roll the dice.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

Humans do best understand pressure.

Pure selection bias. You primarily hear about the humans who did well under pressure, because the humans that didn't do well rarely make for popular reading material.

We make more humans and roll the dice.

I would argue that by the time a child born today is old enough to participate in the solution, the dice will have already landed. Either they'll be living in a city/country/planet whose prior generation has positioned themselves to preserver, or they'll be dying in one whose prior generation didn't.

Having more kids won't solve the problem. We've got 8B people already. One more or less won't tip the scales.

Not having more kids won't solve the problem, either. So no point in getting mad at folks who did choose to have children.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

My parents set the house on fire, I'm looking for a fire extinguisher, and some newsie wants me to know that if I just had kids they could grow up to be firemen.

[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't think that's what is being said at all. I think what's being said is that if the future belongs to the next generation, it's in all of our interests that intelligent and responsible people do not simply give up and allow the idiots to dominate the future. In other words, we all have a stake in the coming generations and simply opting out because we find it somehow inconvenient is not a moral decision.

This is not to say that we all need to have kids, but rather, is to say that we shouldn't necessarily fault those who do choose to have them. Again, if the children are our future, it would be nice if at least some of them were raised by responsible, intelligent and well-educated parents.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

intelligent and responsible people do not simply give up and allow the idiots to dominate the future

That would ring truer if not spoken by an idiot who dominates the present. CNBC is replete with these know-nothing goobers, and even assuming I bought in to their selective breeding strategy for repopulation after the apocolypse, I sure as hell wouldn't endorse their target audience to handle the job.

This is not to say that we all need to have kids, but rather, is to say that we shouldn’t necessarily fault those who do choose to have them

That's fair on its face, but more as a practical consequence. At some point you have to ask, what would we even do about people having more kids than we'd like. And the answers - from trying to shame them by screaming at them to doing old school Nixon-era sterilizations of whole populations - are incredibly grim and gross.

it would be nice if at least some of them were raised by responsible, intelligent and well-educated parents

If you want responsible, intelligent, and well-educated parents tomorrow, you're going to need to house and feed and educate and generally provide quality of life for kids today.

But we hate kids today. That's why, despite the economy growing at a steady clip for the last 20 years, we're at record high child poverty with 1 in 5 kids living in poverty in the 40 richest countries. The current generation does not want to pay money to see them grow up health, strong, and capable.

Given the poor treatment they've received, why would Zoomers be expected to have lots of kids of their own? They have known nothing but declining standards of living, with a promise of worse to come.

[–] Aceofspades@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I already have two kids. Is it too late to adopt this lifestyle?

[–] jwt@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago

I think I once heard something about post-natal abortions.