this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
111 points (92.4% liked)

Explain Like I'm Five

14317 readers
3 users here now

Simplifying Complexity, One Answer at a Time!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

What do these people think they gain?

Whats the point?

Do they really just want to ruin stuff for everyone?

(page 2) 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rogu@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

Hey, great question! Cheating in online games is definitely a bummer. Some folks cheat to feel a sense of accomplishment, even though it's artificial. Others might just enjoy seeing if they can 'break' the game or frustrate other players. It's like they get a weird kick out of it.

Honestly, it can be annoying for the rest of us who just want to have fun. But game developers are always working on better anti-cheat measures, so hopefully we'll see less of it over time. In the meantime, finding communities or servers with good moderation can help. Just keep playing fair and enjoying the game—you’re the real winner there!

[–] satanmat@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I hate cheating in general, however I do have a personal carve out…

Some single player games, like (yes I’m old) doom — I almost always play with a full load out IDDFA No one should be dropping a Space Marine with out full weapons and ammunition and armor.

But that’s it.

Anything else, the point is to learn and find all the stuff the designers want to to discover

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago

Because they're online? Not everyone is playing the same game. There's the same cheating in offline games too, but that's not as visible.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›