this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
849 points (95.5% liked)

Privacy

32177 readers
623 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Some of the LinkedIn Responses are direct and on-point, and also hilariously/depressingly based depending on how you look at it:

EDIT: In hindsight, I think I should've looked into posting this in a different community.. It's closer to a silly "innovation".. soo.. is this considered FUD? I also don't support smoking or vaping, especially among kids. Original title had "privacy-violating" before the "solution".

(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Man, there are a lot of fascists on Lemmy.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

(In response to the OOP, not the OP here)

Fuck off snitch mind your own goddamn business!

[–] philpo@feddit.org 2 points 2 months ago

The funny thing is: This is very likely just a VOC detector with a fancy API. I can't imagine that they spent too much on actual hardware development, especially as they are afaik not a real hardware company.

So it will be triggered by VOC.

You know what else does cause a lot of VOC to be distributed in a environment?

Yeah. Taking a proper shit.

This has very likely never been tested on an actual toilet.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago

Apart from everything else, this is horrible UI.
A pop-up with an X to close button that's supposed to be shown on a TV, which will have no mouse attached.
The text doesn't even read like something that should be customer-facing.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›