this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2024
784 points (98.2% liked)

Fediverse

28489 readers
571 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Probably better to post in the github issue rather than replying here.

https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/4967

(page 6) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago

So, federated network advantages here: you can always modify your instance's hosting code to patch this out, at least for the users on your instance.

What you cannot do is prevent other federated instances from publishing the votes submitted to content on their instance. But if you're accessing that content through your local instance, they can modify the upvote button to pop up a dialog saying something like: "The instance that hosts this content has elected to make usernames visible for upvote/downvote. Would you still like to vote?"

Personally: In many ways I don't mind. I'm on the internet with my real name. I don't mind being accountable for my behaviour online. I might be a little more cautious about upvoting something controversial or NSFW, but largely it wouldn't change my behaviour.

[–] better_world@slrpnk.net 7 points 3 months ago

That’s creepy

[–] SurpriZe@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They simply want to police it better to suit their agenda

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] auzy@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Already had one person today mention my down votes .

It didn't validate their argument at all and without context it can be interpreted in any fashion to make it seem malicious

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Based on the comment, it seems there's more opposition toward visible downvote than upvote, so maybe dev should just make upvote visible and not downvote?

There's more talk about how bad visible downvote is and no one seems to talk about the upvote lol.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 6 points 3 months ago

My posts and comments are already exposed, so it seems like it would make sense to make votes public as well. I think it contributes to the general spirit of the platform.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 3 months ago (8 children)

Sure, but I think we can go further.

Filter the votes I see based on which users or instances I've blocked. I've blocked them for a reason.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›