this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
8 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

31628 readers
244 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"WASHINGTON (AP) — A judge on Monday ruled that Google’s ubiquitous search engine has been illegally exploiting its dominance to squash competition and stifle innovation in a seismic decision that could shake up the internet and hobble one of the world’s best-known companies..."

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Xttweaponttx@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

So stoked to see this. A bit disheartening to read this kinda shit, though=

“This victory against Google is an historic win for the American people,” said Attorney General Merrick Garland. “No company — no matter how large or influential — is above the law. The Justice Department will continue to vigorously enforce our antitrust laws.”

Only to be followed a few paragraphs down by

...a drawn-out appeals process will delay any immediate effects for both consumers and advertisers. The appeals process could take as long as five years...

Sigh.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I sincerely hope they get broken up.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 1 points 2 months ago

Betchu they'll just send a check of 1 B to the FTC and say "that should pay the fine + interest" then go on with their day. Happened in a similar fashion before.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Thoughts and prayers. (I don’t even know if I’m being sarcastic anymore)

[–] Solumbran@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

The punishment will be less big than the profit, they won't stop, as usual.

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 1 points 2 months ago

This is based on older evidence but the exclusive deal Google just signed with reddit makes it pretty clear the monopoly is planned and ongoing.

[–] ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Shatter the company like glass.

They are insanely huge. They should be 10 different companies.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Alphabet is 10 different companies. Google is one of them.

[–] ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Google is Alphabet.

This distinction is meaningless. It is like arguing that Facebook isn't a company anymore and Meta is a totally new institution.

It's Facebook. It's Google.

Its FAANG companies not MAANA companies.

[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Google gained their initial position fair and square. They had the better search engine, and despite the likes of Bing being actually pretty good they were never able to compete.

All Google had to do was to follow its initial mantra of "don't be evil". That's literally all it needed to do. Sadly, they were evil, and these are the seeds of that evil. I maintain today that Chrome, YouTube, Maps, and Search would still be dominant if Google were to welcome third-parties to compete and take space on their devices.

This, IMO, is a case that is damaging to their CEO above anything else. It shows that over the last few years many of the steps taken that have alienated fans and employees have actually damaged the company too. The exec actions have damaged them, and as such the execs should pay the price or course-correct.

[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But... Aren't all of those things still very much dominant?

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

They're saying that google services are dominant and anticompetitive, but not dominant BECAUSE they're anticompetitive.

Even if they were playing fair with competitors, they would still be #1 because they were that good. But because they weren't okay with giving competitors a fair chance, they resorted to anticompetitive practices that hurt consumers, and now this ruling is going to hurt google in return. They could have played nice and everything would have been better for everyone, but they didn't so here we are

[–] small44@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I hope windows will be next