this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
9 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26980 readers
1382 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

No comments or anything, just lots of Downvotes.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mashbooq@infosec.pub 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Because it reports sources known to be unreliable (like Jerusalem Post and EuroNews) as Highly Trustworthy

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I wish it looked like your screenshot. On Boost, I get everything folded out, occasionally with unclickable links.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rezz@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Because it’s literally advertising spam. I can’t believe this person would want to ruin the entire good will of Lemmy by pushing their trash.

It simply serves no purpose.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (10 children)

Because it's biased itself. They whitewash far right conservative sources while listing anything that tries to remain neutral and fact based as having a left bias. Left center to be exact. Then they put far right stuff in "right center" to make you think it's equivalent.

Their factual rating is largely subjective as well. With similar amounts of failed fact checks getting different ratings.

So basically the guys who want to be the guardians of fact and bias are themselves acting in a biased manner instead of an objective one.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 1 points 3 months ago

I really like the idea of the bot.

If the source was independent; and could be trusted. It would be a great tool; the display could be a lot better but the idea is sound.

As others have pointed out, the source is a black box that may or may not be biased itself.

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

Have you asked yourself who runs the bot and what their bias is?

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 months ago (6 children)

If it's trying to tell people that CNN is center-left, who knows wtf else is questionable (or outright wrong).

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] pory@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

Any bot that doesn't actually use lemmy's "I'm a bot" protocol (so I can hide it completely) gets downvoted. It's the only thing I even bother downvoting on Lemmy.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] abaddon@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (4 children)

My problem with the downvotes and the criticisms is that they don't provide any proof or comparison, they simply say that it's biased and wrong.

At the very least you should be linking examples and comparing against other bias checking sites.

For instance, I immediately disliked biasly.com because the rating system is -100 (Liberal) to 100 (Conservative). I've only compared a single site so far but the rating system alone makes me inclined to believe that the site is biased towards conservative views.

[–] ModernRisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Whenever someone gives some good evidence, it gets removed almost immediately. Someone named “Linkerbaan” had two posts about this with actual evidence and it got twice removed.

I tried to search for the one where, I myself commented on and guess? It got removed.

[–] abaddon@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

That's really sketchy. Thanks for sharing.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›