this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

39649 readers
262 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

We are changing our system. We settled on git (but are open for alternatives) as long as we can selfhost it on our own machines.

Specs

Must have

  • hosted on promise
  • reliabile
  • unlikely to be discontinued in the next >5 years
  • for a group of at least 20 people

Plus

  • gui / windows integration
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] antonionardella@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I can vouch for Forgejo

https://forgejo.org/

Easy to set up, has a website GUI like Github/GitLab you can use git GUIs with it

https://codeberg.org runs on Forgejo

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Forgejo is leading the federated git initiative

[–] SpeakinTelnet@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Just to give credit where credit is due, git federation is a Forgefed Initiative

Forgejo is implementing it in their platform.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sure, they are the same people

[–] SpeakinTelnet@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Any evidence of that? Genuinely curious as I can't really find anything about them being by the same people and forgefed started as mailed-based prior to forgejo existing.

edit: seems like they are funded by different organizations and the main contributors to forgefed never worked on forgejo, they worked on vervis though.

[–] chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I’m aware this is the selfhost community, but for a company of 20 engineers, it is probably best to use something commercial in the cloud.

Biggest pain point was for our ops guy, who constantly had to stay behind to perform upgrades and maintenance, as they couldn’t do it during business hours when the engineers are working. With a team of at least 20, scheduling downtimes could get increasingly more difficult.

It also adds an entire system to be audited by the auditors.

The selfhost vs buy commercial kind of bounces back and forth. For smaller teams, less than 5 to 10 engineers, it might be a fun endeavour; but from that point on, until you get to mega corp scale with dedicated ops department maintaining your entire infrastructure, it is probably more effective to just pay for a solution from a major vendor in the cloud instead.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago

Git should be able to go down during the day. Worst case you just can't push to origin for a little while. You can still work and commit locally.