this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
2 points (75.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43945 readers
676 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] superkret@feddit.org 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

There's some areas in the Netherlands and Germany where they removed all signage, traffic lights and sidewalks to create an open, shared traffic area where all participants need to be careful, alert, and communicate with each other to determine right of way and avoid accidents.
The idea was to create uncertainty about who gets to go first and force drivers to slow down.
It reduced the number of accidents and injuries.

Somehow I think this wouldn't work in the US.

[โ€“] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We have this in my town. Ambiguous zones. The idea is it creates confusion, and slows traffic. However, in my state, pedestrians have right of way on ALL roads. So the car simply slows. Mostly.

[โ€“] ChickenBumMcSplatter@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 months ago

I live in Washington, and people just walk into the road as if it was nothing. People be like "pedestrians have the right away", but they forget that the rule of tonnage still applies.

[โ€“] Kwakigra@beehaw.org 1 points 3 months ago

Cars are going to have an advantage over pedestrians most of the time.

[โ€“] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 months ago

In NYC, no change

[โ€“] Barzaria@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago

I think it would be a few months of Mortal Kombat on the off-roads to interstates and at all kinds of junctions as the assholes on the road fight each other to the death. After these guys (it's always dudes) get out of the way, there will be a long period where statisticians say loudly over and over again that getting a licence before the age of 26 is the most dangerous thing a young man can do. They will run campaigns about it, with Republicans somehow convincing people that the safer thing to do would be to get the 16 year old boys in the country driving as quickly as possible. The higher up Republicans will be saying that the men who are getting into Mortal Kombat are the better drivers and that the ones that die are worse at driving and manning, so the roads are safer as a result of the Road Kombat Accord (RCA), especially for men, even more so for young men. The lower down Republicans will act like the RCA is a great honor to get to fight in and that Road Kombat is how our ancestors have done it for generations. Liberals will be sweating and wringing their hands while weakly citing the statisticians. The Republicans will Uno reverse this line of thinking into a no-brain slogan by the name of, "trust 'Ole Statty" so that liberals are afraid to tell people to look into the statistics for fear of getting told that they are in the pocket of 'Ole Statty. Republicans will tell liberals that they are in love with, "'Ole Holes", glory holes that Ole Statty is said to frequent. Liberals will then get confused at this bizarre line of attack on their heterosexuality even though they don't believe that homosexuality is negative or deviant and so all efforts to reverse the RCA will end. Most men would just sigh and not get their driving licenses until they turn 23, with the daring ones only waiting until 20. This would settle into a constant, relatively few, Road Kombats in the end; just a constant statistic of young white trash + minorites getting killed along with a bunch of 20-something's. Most people end up assuming that the deaths were unavoidable and that there is no way to stop them. People state the stats as if they are the natural order. When people point out that the all-cause road deaths are lower in countries without Road Kombat, they will be treated as unpatriotic and ignored, becoming crackpots in the eyes of the many.

[โ€“] neidu2@feddit.nl 1 points 3 months ago

My car was built in the 90's by swedes who welded I-beams together at 90 degrees. My opponent is my crumple zone. I will be fine.

[โ€“] ChickenBumMcSplatter@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I will be yielding. A lot. I ain't risking my life any more than I already am by driving just to go to work.

[โ€“] MorrisonMotel6@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

No yield. Only mortal combat.

[โ€“] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Justice crash!


But seriously, though: if it were hand-to-hand combat, cyclists would have an advantage, on average. That's both because of better physical fitness, and also because they can pick up their bicycle and throw it.

[โ€“] hallettj@leminal.space 1 points 3 months ago

I bring my kid to school on a bike. I follow the right-of-way rules at the 4-way stops and at left turns. But every day there are 1-3 drivers who wave me ahead, and refuse to move until I go first. I don't care what the rules are - I just want consistency!

[โ€“] shreddy_scientist@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The fuck!? I'm already late for work, I don't have time to Finish Him, or anyone! I got to get to the office!!

[โ€“] apotheotic@beehaw.org 1 points 3 months ago

^ My response to my boyfriend with a case of the morning hornies.