this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
63 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19043 readers
3916 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 16 points 3 months ago

Bully for them.

Over here in Freedomland™ we are about to lose our right to vote ever again.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The decline of Sunak shows how important perceptions are in politics. Once feted as a brilliant money man, he proved utterly incompetent as a leader. And once that slide started he couldn't stop it.

As far as I know, all the papers have endorsed Labour (probably not the Daily Mail).

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Yes Sunak failed dismally as a leader. Though there are other factors at play as well. He inherited a poisoned chalice, due to the several factors, some of which were:

  • The Tories had been in power for too many years, and were at the end of the natural cycle of power that occurred in the parliamentary system.
  • The decisions of some of his incompetent predecessors that hung over him (especially those of Liz Truss).
  • The rise of nationalism/extreme right wing politics, and UKIP/the Reform party eating into the Tory voter base (which has been happening for many years but has escalated in recent years).

He did, however, manage to expedite his own political demise with his clueless detachment from what regular citizens are dealing with and the aftermath of Brexit (which his party was mostly responsible for).

[–] xploit@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

"He did, however, manage to expedite his own political demise with his clueless detachment from what regular citizens are dealing with and the aftermath of Brexit (which his party was mostly responsible for)."

His aunt and uncle are reasonably wealthy (think doctor/lawyer, IIRC), but fairly down to earth people, and even they don't like him....his own family, I mean I can't blame them that's for sure.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Reform is currently eating into the Labour vote in huge amounts also (thus far, we've only seen expected Labou results thus far).

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Reform is only picking up about 13 seats, with the tories losing around 230. It doesnt look like they were much of a factor.

[–] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They got 13% of the vote, even if they didn't win many seats.

[–] JK_Flip_Flop@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

They're not taking enough votes to win a lot of seats but I bet they've taken enough votes to change a few marginal Conservative seats into Labour ones.

[–] adam_y@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

I feel like the Tories lost this election rather than labour winning it.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago

Profiles browser via DRM...

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Removed, rule 1, US politics only. See "World".