this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
0 points (50.0% liked)

Privacy

32177 readers
419 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Warning to all Brave Browser Users

Blocking variations.brave.com which is used for A/B testing could potentially break Brave's functionalities. For me did Brave's "forgetful browsing" feature broke which seems to be disabled by default if you block this domain.

#brave #bravebrowser #privacy @privacy @privacyguides

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Anyoneserioius about privacy should not be using a chromium browser, and should definitely not be using brave.

[–] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Firefox is safer and tbh, has probably the best UX and aesthetics out of anyone. Brave is garbage.

[–] stifle867@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As a Firefox user, the only thing Brave does that I wish Firefox would copy is their fingerprinting resistance. I know Firefox does have fingerprinting resistance but it's nowhere near the same level as Brave.

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No. Firefox with RFP, Arkenfox user.js, Librewolf or Tor-Browser unifies your fingerprint. Its universal among users. Brave scrambles it, while some may say that is actually not a real fingerprint and can be detected, making you stand out extremely

[–] stifle867@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just to be clear, are you saying Firefox with fingerprinting resistance used in conjunction with Arkenfox user.js provides fingerprint unification, similar to what Tor browser does? I'll have to check that out.

I think both approaches are valid tbh. Having a unique fingerprint obviously uniquely identified you, but if it's randomised then your browsing sessions can't (in theory) be linked.

[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

The Chameleon extension could solve some of the fingerprinting issues as it can randomize the browser and OS info that is sent.

[–] eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You really just shouldn't use brave..

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Its better than Chrome, Edge, and any other proprietary spyware browser

[–] the_lone_wolf@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Firefox based browsers exits and if you need chromium based there are also other degooled browser available.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

True but don't you think brave is better than chrome?

[–] hardaysknight@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In the same way that I think 3rd degree burns are better than 4th degree burns

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you mean 3rd degree burns compared to second degree burns but I get what you are saying

[–] hardaysknight@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

? 4th degree burn is a real thing

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

True but its basicly the same as 3rd degree burn. You will basicly never see it in the field

[–] hardaysknight@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Now you’re just being pedantic

[–] Mossheart@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago

Check out Vivaldi then.

[–] pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

so what you want people to use opera or Chromnius

[–] eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Stock Firefox is almost as bad as Google Chrome

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org -1 points 1 year ago

Idk wtf you're saying. You mean stock firefox as in firefox with no settings changed? If so, it's not great but in no way as bad as chrome. That's just a ridiculous statement. That being said, hardened Firefox is fine and it's not very hard to do. By harden i mean common sense tweaks. I don't use arkenfox or anything. I think it's overkill at that point.

[–] snake@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

None of these. Use Firefox.