Technology

59666 readers

2723 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

1676

YouTube Says New 5-Second Video Load Delay Is Supposed to Punish Ad Blockers, Not Firefox Users (www.404media.co)

submitted 1 year ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/technology@lemmy.world

403 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Firefox users are reporting an 'artificial' load time on YouTube videos. YouTube says it's part of a plan to make people who use adblockers "experience suboptimal viewing, regardless of the browser they are using."

(page 3) 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Cruelty, is Thy name.

[–] milan@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 year ago

i never experienced that delay in the first place...

[–] CannedCairn@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Oh wow, I just opened lemmy because a YouTube video was taking extra time to open in Firefox lol.

[–] Destraight@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

I'll just blame it on my ISP being shit

[–] superpants@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I've never seen this fake load thing and I always use Firefox

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] wshhh@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

I haven't noticed this in the browser, but I've definitely noticed it using the YouTube app on Roku. No Firefox or ad blocker there.

[–] amotio@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This delay has happened on Brave browser too, it's not FF specific. But it's pathetic either way.

I mean, if they really wanted to show you ads, they could just switch the returned stream when the video player calls for certain chunk, then when that ad is done playing, switch back to the original stream. The user experience would be basically like watching TV.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] Worstdriver@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't know if it makes a difference, but I'm in Canada and I've noticed none of this. No video load delays, no anti ad-blocker pop ups, none of it. I'm not going to stop using Firefox or Ublock Origin though.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I will never again use Chrome again (well maybe except YouTube if stops working in non-chromium-based browsers), we need to get Web back into our hands! It is sad that it took me too many years to realize that, I hope others will follow.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] elscallr@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's punishing me and I'm using their app. Their video loading has been spotty as shit lately. And I know it's not my bandwidth, I've got 5Gbps available and 12ms latency to YouTube's closest data center.

I'm not even blocking the ads when I use it.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Strange then how my Vivaldi browser doesn't have the load time, then. Almost like it's a punishment for non-chromium users.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments