this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2024
476 points (99.6% liked)

Science Memes

11253 readers
2927 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Is that Avogadro's constant?

[–] Bumblefumble@lemm.ee 29 points 6 months ago

Yes, it's the avocado man himself in the picture.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 35 points 6 months ago

The Man, the Myth, the Mole

[–] perishthethought@lemm.ee 25 points 6 months ago

I wish I had an avocado.

[–] crazyCat@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

Can someone help a pleb like me know the guy and the number reference? Edit: thanks guys!, I’ll study him :-)

[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 28 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It's Avogadro's constant. The number of carbon atoms in 12 grams of carbon.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avogadro_constant

[–] acetanilide@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Wait. They redefined it in 2019 but I thought that "new" way was what I did in school 🤔

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

They changed the definition, the value is the same (within the error of the best available measurement of the time).

[–] DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Isn't it the number of atoms of ANY element for it's element in number of grams?

[–] sirprize@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago (3 children)
[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 15 points 6 months ago

You kids these days with your Avogadro toast...

[–] No_Change_Just_Money@feddit.de 9 points 6 months ago

Holy Mole-y

[–] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] marcos@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

And that's how you capture a thread.

[–] OhmsLawn@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago
[–] Zink@programming.dev 7 points 6 months ago

I love this image, and this was one of my favorite numbers in science too. Sometimes I think it’s more difficult to imagine how insanely small the atomic scale is than how insanely large the cosmic scale is.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Either people didn’t know how to draw back then, or Avogado was monstrously ugly…

[–] VelvetStorm@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

This style of drawing wasn't about making someone look pretty or ugly it was about making an accurate portrait, so he likely looked very similar.

[–] ilikecoffee@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

He looks like a mole..

[–] someacnt_@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Maybe I look like him.. 😥

[–] indepndnt@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

I googled "was Avogadro ugly" and found this picture posted on r/funny ten years ago. But also quite a few people seem to agree that he was indeed quite ugly.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago
[–] mumblerfish@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Hey, that number is off by 2.14076 * 10^21