It doesn't matter. List all the crap you want, but show me the most up to date official documentation for the postgres "IN" operator in the very first result! It can't be that hard.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

But the 9.6 version, or 11 version, could be the most popular.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] johny_joe_1975@discuss.online 1 points 6 months ago

So many SEO trick to put yourselves into top google search for traffic.

I have google for bug and stuff, and most common bug can be found on shitty content Java tip page with broken format, lot of ads, and sometime untrue/outdate information.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml -3 points 6 months ago (7 children)

I've started relying more on AI-powered tools like Perplexity for many of my search use-cases for this very fact - all results basically warrant a pre-filtering to be useful.

load more comments (7 replies)

[–] tiredofsametab@kbin.run -3 points 6 months ago

You didn't include a version in your query. You also could try using quotes, though this specific entry may not be helped by it (e.g. "in operator"). For most things, you can click a link with the older version and somewhere there is typically a dropdown or something to change the version and, if not, you'll at least know which section/etc. it is in in the new documentation.

If you don't include a version, it's probably going to pull up questions/answers that it finds most match in general and maybe people just aren't asking that question for your version.

I think there's a lot to hate about modern search results, but I also think there's some opportunity to search better. I do miss the days when AND, OR, and NOT operators actually worked all the time and as expected.

[–] eightforty@lemmy.world -3 points 6 months ago

How aboout you do your own code? Badumtiish

load more comments