this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
898 points (95.4% liked)

Memes

45729 readers
962 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 48 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Culture war issues will never go away until people figure out where the real source of their pain comes from. It comes from the 1 percenters. It's a class war. It always has been.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's far, far less than 1%. It's more like the 0.0001%.

64 billionaires divided by 38 million people times 100 = 0.000168% of the population. I like where your head is at but 1 percenter is an old and inaccurate term.

[–] MrBusiness@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well yeah, but it's easier to say 1%. Then explaining it's actually fewer we have to eat that's just a bonus.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah but it's wrong. The 1% don't control all the companies and real estate, the billionaires do.

[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

However The 1% are all a part of the bourgeoisie.

[–] Enkrod@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

380 million, if you're talking about the US.

[–] CoderKat@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

While I think the rich are one of the most influential sources of it, I'm not convinced they're the only or even the majority. Like, of the rich stopped using bigotry to divide people, would people stop being bigoted? I don't think so at all. I think there's something wrong with humanity that makes it easy for bigotry to evolve even in the absence of power and perhaps worse, for people to want to be bigoted.

[–] kugel7c@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

If sapolsky is to be believed we have the natural inclination to view in- and out- group as part of our brain. Everything else is learned or a coping mechanism. I guess this is why people propose lived multiculturalism especially during childhood as a solution to xenophobia.

No matter if he can be believed or not on this fact the book is fun wiki

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tubaruco@lemm.ee 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

class war is way more fun, just look at tf2!

[–] worldsayshi@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Now I want a team based FPS game where classes are the economic classes.

And you can decide to revolt and switch around the teams to make it proletariat versus bourgeoisie. (The French sure have weird spelling btw)

What ever team that can hold the most strategic points/means of production long enough wins.

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

tbh English isn't that much better than french at that. Just in this sentence there are a bunch of syllables that don't sound like they should. Y'all can't even decide if color has a u in it 💀

[–] tubaruco@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

no language is perfect, the other guy was just saying french has weirder spelling than english

[–] TauZero@mander.xyz 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

German is perfect. Everyone will agree how to spell Schifffahrkarte the moment they hear it.

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Of course, but english is in the weird spelling side of the spectrum. For (maybe an extreme) example Japanese spelling bees must be boring af cause words are spelled exactly as they are said, and with few exceptions (in kana) every sound has only one character associated with it (two cause there's a second alphabet/syllabary with them)

On the flipside they also have literally thousands of characters in yet a third alphabet because reading only the phonetic ones is a pain in the butt and there are so many homonyms oh my god

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

"Culture war" = "issues that don't affect me personally".

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah, class reductionism will only ever lead to more oppression of those already marginalised.

If your leftism doesn't include intersectionality, you're doing it wrong.

(to be clear - "culture wars" are a right winged distraction, but they are based on very real and massively impactful systems of oppression that they are trying to maintain, ignoring this only enables them, and guarantees those systems will remain even if we get economical change)

[–] rwhitisissle@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If your leftism doesn’t include intersectionality, you’re doing it wrong.

Similarly, if your intersectionality doesn't include leftism, it's literally worse than useless because it functionally works to maintain the underlying material conditions that served to create whatever social injustice you are fighting.

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago

This also is true, yes.

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the right take, IMO. Labelling race, gender etc issues as "diversions" has the same flavour as "I know the slaves are oppressed, but freeing them doesn't end capitalism, does it?"

[–] AMuscelid@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The diversion is the idea of rainbow capitalism. For example: fighting for the right for people of any identity to own slaves is not a valid goal and also won't "free the slaves." Ending slavery is the goal. Rainbow capitalism acts as a shell game to divert energy toward token concessions and labels them victories. Anti-racism and feminism should be (and I would say, are) at the core of any coherent flavor of leftism, but diverse oppression is still oppression and a rainbow flag on a Raytheon missile is not a win.

Edit: should have read the comment further down. Said what I meant but with gooder words.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Issues that don't alter economic arrangements yet are the focus of mainstream politics, or issues amplified and masqueraded as politics for this specific purpose. The idea that people you resent being treated worse than you is a political achievement, is the foundational mechanism of culture war. As the basic economic arrangement is no longer on the table or negotiable politically, politics increasingly becomes focused on individual resentments. The right is fueled by culture war right now more than any other political faction.

[–] worldsayshi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It does seem like a good diversion tactic to blame a completely unrelated minority for a completely unrelated problem when you really want to protect billionaires from raised taxes.

I mean just move the discussion as far away as possible from them.

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They want people to punch down, blame the person scraping by on welfare or the person who's identity is maligned for what is actually caused by massive wealth disparity. MLK Jr didn't advocate fighting a vague notion of racism, he convinced black and white unions they were stronger together and that economic equality as a class program was the mechanism to combat the issue, with specific laws and legislation and job action as the tools available. In a certain context, the biggest advocacy group for the rights of gender non-conforming individuals in the world right now is the AFL-CIO.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't even think this is even that complicated.

The TEXTBOOK playbook for bringing people together to find peace, is to start by finding some common ground. On LITERALLY anything. Then you build on that. "Maybe, given enough time, we can grow to understand to have enough the same that we can work together"

Culture war is the simple inversion: find something, ANYTHING that you can disagree about. Then you build on that. "Maybe, given enough time, we can grow to understand others to be different enough that working together is impossible"

[–] Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's a nice thought, but what comes across is "Your current problems aren't important, now support my fringe political view"

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What would be a better way to frame it?

[–] Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I think I meant to reply to the OP, sorry. Your comment is great, and I like it much more.

[–] AMuscelid@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The right is way more hooked into the culture war, but plenty of leftist communities cannibalize each other via "no true Scots"-ing each other with intersectionality. I see very little patience or compassionate education on intersectionality, and instead see a competition about how quickly one can scold. Regardless of whether that's valid, it sure as hell makes it difficult to build bonds with other groups or onboard new folks to leftist ideas.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Yeah as a culture war target I don't have anymore choice in being a part of the war than Ukraine does. I don't get to opt out, and people can say, "Just don't fight the culture war, fight the class war," and it's like, dude, you're telling the majority of your potential allies to fuck off and die so you can charge a pillbox solo. It ain't gonna go well.

[–] Avnar@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Its our job to turn the Culture War into Class War by showing how the Cultural injustices are caused by Class Oppression.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Working class can have little a culture war. As a treat.

[–] worldsayshi@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Why don't they ~~eat cake~~ fight amongst themselves?

[–] Iunnrais@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

Rich people have always had the freedom to be who they are. You think wealthy gay men were beaten up in back alleys? Maybe they couldn’t announce it to the world but they pretty much got to live their lives in peace. When you don’t have to work to survive and when the world bends to your will it’s amazing how culture doesn’t seem to effect you so harshly anymore.

It’s not that culture isn’t important. It’s that the ability to live in peace for who you are tends to come automatically when you have your living taken care of.

[–] Schnabeltierpoet@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago

Hm... When I woke up this morning I did not expect to see a Diebels-Alt-bottle in a meme today...

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No war but the class (culture) war.

The culture war is a distraction from the class war being waged on working class people.

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago
[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

No war but class war.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

unexpectedly based

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Somebody has got to fighting the War on Christmas (on the side of warring against Christmas).

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

If locking up short people in green uniforms and making them work in my toy factory for life is wrong, I don’t want to be right.

[–] uis@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago
[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It would help if leftist identitarians weren't constantly purity spiraling.

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are the ones that coopted and undermined Occupy Wallstreet back in the day.

[–] seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

OWS was run by anarchists. They had zero goals or leadership, and they actually seemed proud of that fact. It's kind of mind-boggling that they thought they could accomplish anything by simply camping out indefinitely.

In view of that, I really can't blame the identitarians for trying to co-opt. If they had won, there would've at least been goals and an agenda, instead of...sitting in tents all day.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lauchs@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Man, if we'd stop fighting culture war issues, we'd have won the class war. But on the Left, we always take the bait.

I always think of it like, would we rather the North fought for abolition or should the North tried to rally around universal suffrage, gay marriage, trans rights and abolition, have no states join them and have the confederacy be almost every state and slavery not stop. Like, yup, it'd be nice if everyone was on the right page right away but cultural progress takes time. And Fox news goads the Left into fighting fights that the mainstream isn't quite ready for yet.

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Reconstruction was pretty royally bungled by the Andrew Johnson presidency as well, and the Populists who fought with racial solidarity after for what was in essence a class mission were dealt with by the capitalist class.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›