Hint: :q!
Sister communities:
Community rules (click to expand)
1. Follow the site-wide rules
sudo in Windows.Please report posts and comments that break these rules!
Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.
We all know who's the real steward of free software and federation
*smiles in anticipation*
legit had to draw the vector logo of Gogs for this, smh
edit: actually... it already exists, oopsie (ᵕ—ᴗ—) smh my head
Gitlab is also thinking of going to federation. It will be interesting as git is already a federated protocol, now our prs, follows, stars, ect will also be federated between different instances.
already a defeated protocol
Once again, SVN is victorious.
I will never bow down to the trunk!
Lol! Woops. I'm on my phone and it autocorrected.
I recently looked this up again and it looks like the person who started the federation work in Gitlab got a new job and isn't really working on it any more. So sadly this seems to be on hold as Gitlab the company is not themselves investing staff-hours into federation.
Aww, this is a terrible day for rain...
That is too bad, but also at the same time I kind of lost hope for Gitlab after they jumped on the AI hype train, if they're going full corporate they probably wouldn't be a good candidate for Federation (both because other people would defederate them and because they wouldn't want to because competition).
I've read in some issue tracker that the gitbal guys aren't really interested in federation. It makes sense, they are a business. Seems that having push mirrors is a premium feature, so federation would go contrary.
I'd love to be proven wrong though.
I want all that so bad
Gitlab is also thinking of going to federation.
I hope Gitlab has helped the contributor out in their work, last I heard it was just one person on it
Yeah GL has this strange thing where part of it is open source, but not all.
Yeah it’s called open core and it’s basically every open source SaaS product where you can either:
Even a single security fuckup on the scale of GitLab's mistake earlier this year means I will not consider using their codebase.
I'd like to know how Forgejo is pronounced
Something like for-jay-yo.
From https://forgejo.org/faq/ :
Forgejo (pronounced /forˈd͡ʒe.jo/) is inspired by forĝejo, the Esperanto word for forge.
Neat
I've learned some Esperanto and still think the name is stupid. Make your app have a sane, pronounceable name to any old person.
ngl I thought it was pronounced for-geh-joe until I had gone on their website, I was stunned for a few minutes when I found out
But whatever, who speaks Esperanto anyway? 😛
Actually, are these 2 forks of another, when?
Yes forgejo was forked from gitea in 2022. It was a soft fork at first, but became a hard fork earlier this year.
Full story here: https://forgejo.org/2024-02-forking-forward/
Radicle maybe
Good tip! Never gave it a better look. It solves a big issue I have, with centralized power. Local first is great!
Any more git bundles you should care about?
That's a pretty decent list, I actually can't remember many more, maybe I'd add Onedev, but I've been skeptical about it since it's gone more corporate, so idk.
Actually, are these 2 forks of another, when?
To be fair, the meme isn't exactly accurate, because the forking relationship is this:
Gogs
└ Gitea
└ Forgejo
But the colors just fit too good not to use this meme, so there you go lol
Sourcehut is already federated! The workflows use a combination of email (which is federated), and git clones (which are decentralized)
uninformed comment
That's fine in and of itself, but, personally, I could never bring myself to use a forge which isn't fully featured and easy to use.
spoiler ~~(rant)~~ Sourcehut is just so counterintuitive to me and I shrug every time I see a project actually using it, I feel like many wouldn't even consider making contributions unless they were very motivated. To the average person, it just looks like an unwelcoming experience, especially for the email centric focus, like, why should I switch to another application just to open an issue? At least integrate it with the the web UI, like idk, make it a specialized email client for the platform, so I don't have to juggle multiple things.
Don't get me wrong tho, it's the closest we have to the bare git workflow of the "before times" with a bit more accessibility on top, it's not bad, but in a way these new web forges have spoiled us devs into relying on cohesive web services which happen to have vendor lock-in, but that can change and it is slowly doing so :::
edit: deleted for inaccurate info, don't consider my dumb rant O.o
I found it unfamiliar in the few times I saw it, but maybe it's worth giving a try
What is the diff between Forgejo, Gitea and Gogs?
From what I understand, both uses Gogs under the hood
Gogs started it originally, but was forked into Gitea years ago and hasn't seen much development since.
Forgejo is a newer fork of Gitea after the IP rights to Gitea were (secretly) transferred to a for-profit company and some of the developers started to turn the project into a commercial open-core one.
wdym "for now"?
Forgejo is a community owned fork of Gitea which is privately owned.
One day we can expect Gitea to pull the license for money as we see almost every private company do. Although I do hope they don't.
Isn't that the gogs story repeated?
I don't
Green Forgejo is typing...
Is this official? It'd be strange if it were only hosted on a random cloud storage provider
Wait, so forgejo is already federated?
Not yet, but they are the ones actively working on it, so it will likely arrive there first. Still a few months out though.
