this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
150 points (77.0% liked)

World News

32348 readers
452 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stifle867@programming.dev 57 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (25 children)

For those looking for a source, I looked into it and yes the source is the CCPs claims. We all know how trustworthy CCP statistics are.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-07732-5

According to the Chinese NFI, national forest coverage has increased by 2.15% in the 7th NFI and by 3.41% in the 8th NFI

By contrast, the GFC dataset, which is considered to be more accurate than previous remote sensing datasets due to its unprecedented global high spatial resolution, showed that the change in forest area of China between 2000 and 2012 was a net loss of 38,743 km2, equivalent to a decline of 0.40% in national forest coverage

Basically, satellite imagery seems to "strangely" conflict with CCP figures.

[–] zerfuffle@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That GFC study contradicts the many studies using both older datasets and newer datasets:

CAS: https://english.cas.cn/newsroom/mutimedia_news/202203/t20220322_302792.shtml

UNESCO: http://www.unesco-hist.org/index.php?r=en/article/info&id=1714

Journal of Geophysical Research: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2022JG007101

Remote Sensing: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/13/2592

International Journal of Remote Sensing: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01431161.2021.2022804

International Journal of Digital Earth: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17538947.2023.2190625

In science, we call this "cherrypicking data." Colloquially, we understand this to be because someone fucked their experimental validation. In the real world, we call this "disseminating misinformation."

global-scale data cannot reasonably represent changes in the regional land cover. Moreover, different studies may have different accuracies within the same region and even may reach opposite conclusions

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] HornyOnMain@hexbear.net 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

ngl, vietnam is looking pretty impressive too

[–] mar_k@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago

Cuba is at 57.5%, also one of the highest in the world percentage-wise

[–] Krause@lemmygrad.ml 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Xi is genociding the deserts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] YaBoyMax@programming.dev 25 points 1 year ago (46 children)

This article is nearly two years old. Also, I implicitly distrust any source which depicts Taiwan as part of the PRC.

[–] axont@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Every single country on Earth except like seven (I only remember the Vatican and Paraguay) acknowledges that Taiwan is a dependent province of the PRC, including the USA and just about all of Europe.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] zerfuffle@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The unofficial consensus between the KMT/PRC was that Taiwan and China are one country. The NED-funded DPP has been trying to break that status quo, though.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago

Also, I implicitly distrust any source which depicts Taiwan as part of the PRC.

What did the RoC Marine Corps do to you?

[–] CarmineCatboy@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago

that's a healthy way to distrust the US and chinese governments i guess

load more comments (41 replies)
[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago
[–] GorbinOutOverHere@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago
[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder what's going on with the DPRK

[–] axont@hexbear.net 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Pretty bad drought and floods over the past 20 years, and the country is too mountainous to support most effective reforestation strategies. So it's mostly climate change, economic isolation, and only 17% of the land can support forests in the first place. It's not a good time right now.

load more comments
view more: next ›