this post was submitted on 06 May 2024
145 points (95.0% liked)

World News

39142 readers
2552 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 93 points 6 months ago (3 children)

He's going to release the details of Hamas' cease-fire agreement and the changes he wants, right?

[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 38 points 6 months ago

Totally. It’s what a reasonable person would do. I’m sure they’re reasonable changes too.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 32 points 6 months ago

After he finishes bombing Rafah flat, of course. One must focus on priorities in a crisis.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

It's just two weeks away.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 89 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

"Unfortunately the terms of this ceasefire don't include the death of every Palestinian in the world and also a complementary blowjob for me, so we can't accept it."

-Benjamin Netanyahu, probably.

[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 38 points 6 months ago

“It’s a shame that Hamas continues to hide behind the lives of Palestinian civilians. Now if they were all dead they couldn’t do that.”

*Netanyahu taps forehead

CNN looks puzzled and wonders what that means; they publish an article titled ’Why all the Palestinian suddenly decided to just die’.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 months ago

Let's be real. He would only accept a ceasefire if the terms of the ceasefire is he can never go to jail for corruption.

[–] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 80 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Israel's requirements:

Kill them all

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 25 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I didn't know all of Israel was from Buenos Aires.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago

Netanyahu is indeed the type to drop an asteroid on his own city on purpose so he has a reason to go kill bugs.

[–] athos77@kbin.social 53 points 6 months ago

destroy Hamas's military and governing capabilities

"scuse us while we move some goalposts here ....

and ensure that Gaza does not pose a threat to Israel in the future

And suddenly it's not 'Hamas' that's a threat, but 'Gaza'. More moving goalposts, and revealing Israel's real aim: the elimination of Gaza itself. Except, like the Republicans, who constantly have to create a new threat to 'defend' themselves against, after Gaza it'll be the West Bank. And after that it'll be something else ...

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 26 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Netanyahu doubts any peace will last, so I think he was looking for a more final solution...

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

He just needs a little Lebensraum to stretch his legs.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

The USA refused to lift the arms embargo on Bosnia to allow it to defend itself because UK and France didn't want a Muslim majority nation in Europe, and Clinton shrugged and said "okay"

Then Pakistan used KSA funds to covertly supply the Bosnians with ATGMs via Turkey air drops which ultimately changed the tide of the war.

Then suddenly the USA spent years harassing the UN to charge the ISI director with breaking the embargo.

The fact that they handled an ongoing genocide of which they had zero interest or risk in with such attitude is why no one takes the USA seriously when it complains about literally any foreign issue.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inter-Services_Intelligence_activities_in_Bosnia_and_Herzegovina

Clinton said U.S. allies in Europe blocked proposals to adjust or remove the embargo. They justified their opposition on plausible humanitarian grounds, arguing that more arms would only fuel the bloodshed, but privately, said the president, key allies objected that an independent Bosnia would be "unnatural" as the only Muslim nation in Europe. He said they favored the embargo precisely because it locked in Bosnia's disadvantage. [..] When I expressed shock at such cynicism, reminiscent of the blind-eye diplomacy regarding the plight of Europe's Jews during World War II, President Clinton only shrugged. He said President François Mitterrand of France had been especially blunt in saying that Bosnia did not belong, and that British officials also spoke of a painful but realistic restoration of Christian Europe. Against Britain and France, he said, German chancellor Helmut Kohl among others had supported moves to reconsider the United Nations arms embargo, failing in part because Germany did not hold a seat on the U.N. Security Council.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I don’t think people realize how fucked up that war was. It seems to get lumped in with post-Soviet chaos rather than a separate thing that happened because world leaders made specific choices that we need to learn from.

I mean, Europe and the U.S. made awful decisions but the diplomacy to end it also required the U.S. and Europe. Almost nothing about that conflict is a simple story of good vs. evil. And it happened before most people had constant access to news so it was often unclear what was happening until later.

Edit: I’m not defending any country there. I’m just saying it was a fucking mess.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago

No pesky peace deals are going to get in the way of Netanyahu's genocide.

[–] Raptor_007@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

Oh what a surprise

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I wish I was surprised. Netanyahu needs to go.

[–] doctortofu@reddthat.com 8 points 6 months ago

To jail, for the rest of his life, yes. Not that I'm holding my breath for it though - the international community has demonstrated time and again that genocide is compmetely fine, as long as it's happening far away and not to "our people".