this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2024
595 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

69545 readers
4621 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lipilee@feddit.nl -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

while i'm obviously sure it's a bluff, pulling out instead of selling would be the clearest admittance that tiktok is (or at that point: was) not about the profit, but about Chinese influence in the US. the message being "we rather leave a hudred billion dollars on the table than give away our surveillance technology to some US company."

but yeah, they will def. sell if they need to.

[–] Aux@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

It's more like their US profits are no match for their Chinese profits. Social media use in China and other Asian countries dwarfs US use.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] adam@doomscroll.n8e.dev -2 points 1 year ago

Let's be honest, this is only their outlook until the courts make their decision. They'll sell if that doesn't go in their favour.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›