this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
297 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

59666 readers
2672 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 77 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

*Google proceeding with authoritarian DRM API on Android. Will attempt to resurrect in Chromium core within the next few years.

[–] WhyYesZoidberg@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah they made people “used” to the idea. I’m sure the next proposal will be met with less backlash than this one.

Or maybe a third attempt will be required? Anyways the writing is on the wall.

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I've been saying it for months now: note the language on the YouTube ad-blocker messages.

It's not "Please turn off ad blockers", it's "Ad-blockers are not allowed".

They're not asking, they're not being polite, they're not trying to coax you, or imply the site won't work if you leave the ad-blockers on.

They're drawing a line. They're telling you, from this point forward, they are the authority and they are declaring ad-blockers as verboten.

That language is extremely telling, and it signals a very troubling future for the web, because the rest of the internet is going to follow their lead on this. As soon as Google provides them the means to enforce this authority, they will.

[–] dingleberry@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gonna wait for the outcry to settle before pushing it anyway.

[–] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago

As is tradition

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong, since I'm a bit tired for parsing through the deliberately opaque wall of legalese and buzzword bullshit, but is this android api basically their way of killing YouTube frontends such as NewPipe, SmartTube and LibreTube to force their dystopian adscape on all of us again?

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's mostly just a way to sell businesses and websites on the idea.

[–] drislands@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

On what idea?

[–] style99@kbin.social -2 points 1 year ago

If only their devs weren't lazy dumbasses, they wouldn't need that shit to inject their ads into videos in the first place. Pathetic.