this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
659 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

59641 readers
2671 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works 9 points 7 months ago

Good luck Youtube, you fools.

[–] fiend_unpleasant@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

I hear people talking about how Youtube is not paying out like it used to. So they are playing ads to us and not paying the creators. There is a growing group of people looking at open source platforms like Odysee and PeerTube.

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Those that do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

[–] gentooer@programming.dev 7 points 7 months ago

I hope the YouTube Kodi plugin stays working, otherwise I'll have to write a script to download all latest videos in my subscription to my home server.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


YouTube is bringing its ad blocker fight to mobile.

In an update on Monday, YouTube writes that users accessing videos through a third-party ad blocking app may encounter buffering issues or see an error message that reads, “The following content is not available on this app.”

It also began disabling videos for users with an ad blocking extension enabled.

But now, YouTube says its policies don’t allow “third-party apps to turn off ads because that prevents the creator from being rewarded for viewership.” This appears to target mobile ad blockers like AdGuard, which lets you open YouTube within the ad blocking app, where you’ll get to view videos interruption-free.

“When we find an app that violates these terms, we will take appropriate action to protect our platform, creators, and viewers.”

This likely won’t come as pleasant news to all the users who watch YouTube through ad blocking apps, but it doesn’t look like YouTube is backing down in its battle against ad blockers anytime soon.


The original article contains 220 words, the summary contains 165 words. Saved 25%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] nl4real@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Lmao, I keep hearing about this but my Ublock Origin & Firefox keeps chugging along fine on both desktop and mobile. Eat my ass, Neal Mohan.

[–] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

This sound familiar to anyone?

[–] JCreazy@midwest.social 5 points 7 months ago (3 children)

LibreTube hasn't worked in a couple of weeks

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PoliticallyIncorrect@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

microG, Newpipe and brave still working like a charm..

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don't see how they'll stop these without majorly changing the functionality of the site. Most just load the none ad portions of the video. I don't understand how they'll prevent that.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 8 points 7 months ago (7 children)

The simplest solution is to embed the ads in the video stream.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But the ad blocking algorithm can notice the jump cut, (simple audio/video/meta data.) irregularities and then just jump forward to the regular video.

[–] Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Those certainly are words, but how does this jump cut detection algorithm work?

Embedding an ad doesn't need to change any of the video stream information in a serious way. It's not like they're going to do something obvious like change the colorspace and encoding scheme several times just for ads, because that would provide artifacts for these types of mitigation techniques. And even if they did, how is that any different from changing the quality of the stream to continue serving video despite degraded or improved network connections? Google could decide to implement random quality changes and break this particular workaround.

Plus, if they're embedding ads into the data stream, how exactly is the metadata going to change? It's the same connection, served from the same location, over the same socket. It's not like sections of video need to have "AD" in the middle of their encoded data streams.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›