this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
144 points (92.4% liked)

Technology

59578 readers
3420 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

YouTube is getting serious about blocking ad blockers::YouTube is cracking down on ad blockers. In a statement to The Verge, YouTube’s Christopher Lawton says the company has launched a “global effort” to urge people to allow ads on the platform.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Its_Always_420@lemmy.world 98 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Uninstall Chrome (includes Edge, Brave, Vivaldi & many more) and replace with Firefox plus uBlock Origin

Problem solved

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (11 children)

I personally prefer LibreWolf (Firefox based)

[–] Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think we should stop sending people to alternative "Firefox based" browser that will likely break compatibility even more than it is broken on Firefox. It will only frustrate the user and send him back to random chromium based alternative like brave. Firefox default privacy settings are more than enough for the regular user.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't say it's good for most people, I just prefer it and think other privacy oriented people should as well

[–] Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I understand. I am sure that most, if not all people who care about privacy already use Firefox. We need to help regular users to hope into Firefox. These people tend to know almost nothing about computers and a site that doesn't work is Firefox not working.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SandbagTiara2816@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’ve seen LibreWolf mentioned a few times. What’s the difference between the two?

[–] AlphaAutist@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

LibreWolf is just hardened Firefox

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Just_Pizza_Crust@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why the recommendation for Firefox in this matter since ublock is promising support for multiple browsers?

[–] Its_Always_420@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because Google broke how websites load in Chrome specifically to destroy adblock. They can punch holes in any adblocker that uses the Chromium web rendering engine. However Firefox does not use any Chromium code and still works the way it always has. uBlock (use uBlock Origin instead) will likely still work somewhat on Chorme, but would be helpless to block some ads.

[–] jmp242@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This may be true for chrome, but as far as I can tell anyone building chromium can also change that open source code to not break ad blockers?

[–] subtext@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

While in theory that is true, Chromium is still mostly controlled by Google. Some people may decide that they are going to maintain forks of Chromium that strip out certain features of Chromium, but the pace of development is relentless, releasing new builds several times per day. It would take some seriously deep pockets to be able to staff developers who can keep up with the contributions from Google and Microsoft and others and ensure their fork remains up to date and not broken.

So yes, someone could change that open source code, but it’s really not feasible in the long run, and so Google (and to a lesser extent Microsoft), can control the browser experience for the majority of desktop users, including things like Manifest V3 or that “Digital DRM” that we were hearing about a while back.

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Installing adblocker on Chrome is kind of like putting on a rain jacket once you're already wet.

[–] Forester@yiffit.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It doesn't solve the problem they still throw a warning every three videos. Brand new Firefox install with only u block. Both at latest version you block updated daily

[–] Renacles@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Purge cache and update, it's that simple.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] JDPoZ@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Hmmm, weird.

Anyway, cross-posting one of my favorite random comments from some other cool person I saw in a thread the other day :

Android :

iOS :

Web :

Desktop :

TV :

Android TV - SmartTubeNext

Apple TV - Yattee with this guide

[–] heygooberman@lemmy.today 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is awesome! Thanks for sharing!

I'd like to add onto this and mention this app that I found while trying out the Android apps you listed. It's called PipePipe

https://github.com/InfinityLoop1308/PipePipe

[–] Ghostlight@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

This guy needs a medal

[–] xfts@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And Playlet if you use a Roku or Roku TV 😉

[–] netchami@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Nice to see that other people find the list I put together useful

[–] Kuro@lemm.ee 42 points 1 year ago

All this accomplishes is doubling down my resolve to never give youtube a penny

[–] coffeebiscuit@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

Cable, its cable now.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

YouTube wants users to allow ads or sign up for Premium.

[–] 314xel@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Youtube wantses, Youtube don't getses. Just like Gmail wantsed and I moved to another email provider. They want the money to stop shoving the ads, but still keep the tracking going. Well, I'm the product or the customer, I can't be both.

[–] GrammatonCleric@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And I'm serious about keeping Revanced updated ☺️

[–] Octopus1348@thelemmy.club 11 points 1 year ago

And uBlock Origin

[–] mawkishdave@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I switched my VPN to Moldova and I haven't seen a add, some of these small countries it's not worth it to have ads.

[–] Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ideally we would have an ad blocker that interacts with the ads themselves in background.

[–] netchami@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

You mean something like AdNauseam?

[–] Voyajer@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Youtube doesn't even serve ads to me if my useragent is a crawler.

[–] Wes_Dev@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Oh, interesting.

Care to share the string?

[–] gorysubparbagel@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pretty soon we're going to need an adblock blocker blocker

[–] Rinox@feddit.it 7 points 1 year ago

Ublock origin has it already, it's been a few years now. I think it just blocks the JavaScript code that checks if the ads are being played (not sure though)

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


YouTube is broadening its efforts to crack down on ad blockers.

The platform has “launched a global effort” to encourage users to allow ads or try YouTube Premium, YouTube communications manager Christopher Lawton says in a statement provided to The Verge.

YouTube confirmed that it was disabling videos for users with ad blockers in June, but Lawton described it as only a “small experiment globally” at the time.

Over the past several weeks, more users with ad blockers installed have found themselves unable to watch YouTube videos, with a post from Android Authority highlighting the increase in reports.

YouTube has made several changes to the way ads operate on its platform this year.

YouTube is likely hoping that its lengthy ad breaks drive more users to sign up for its ad-free YouTube Premium subscription, but a $2 price hike and the discontinuation of its cheaper Premium Lite plan might make the option less attractive.


The original article contains 290 words, the summary contains 154 words. Saved 47%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›