this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2024
290 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2341 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
aidan@lemmy.world
jordanlund@lemmy.world
HLMenckenFan@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
290
Elon Musk shares “extremely false” allegation of voting fraud by “illegals” (arstechnica.com)
submitted 7 months ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 69 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The problem is that, while it's easily disproven, the majority of people who read his statement will take it at face value, and because his platform is so large, it would take a lot of people disproving his claim to have even a fraction of the same reach.

People with appreciably large platforms or loud microphones can spread disinformation with no recourse, and there's really no effective way to counter it. I don't know what the solution to this is, but it's a huge problem and has been for quite some time.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago

Those who can provably disprove it and have standing should sue. We've bankrupted Lindell, we can power a new American economy purely by suing delusional rich assholes... and it'll actually get them to shut up unlike calmly explaining why they're wrong.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

People with appreciably large platforms or loud microphones can spread disinformation with no recourse, and there's really no effective way to counter it. I don't know what the solution to this is

Enforcing anti-trust law.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Not sure how that stops rich assholes from spouting lies on social media...

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

It wouldn't stop them from posting, but it would stop them from having monopolistic control and the power to amplify those lies with impunity.

[–] Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 63 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

This prick has become on of the most dangerous people in the country. He’s eager to agree with any senseless right wing conspiracy theory and boosts them on his platform, responding with very thought-free one word replies like “yup”, “exactly”, “concerning” or “!!”. It doesn’t seem like he has the mental power or any desire to assess whether some claims are true, such as his assertion to Don Lemon that undocumented people being counted on the census unfairly boosted the representation numbers for California - totally ignoring that the same would be true for Texas and Florida, as if no immigrants live in “red” states. Same with the “Democrats are mass-importing voters!!”. I don’t think he even cares if this tripe is true, as long as he gets to slam Democrats and rile up conservatives. The panic he’s trying to inspire with the “illegals voting!!” BS is predicated on the assumption that immigrants would all vote for democrats, which isn’t even true.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Republicans are nicer to billionaires

That’s it, he has the money to go anywhere he wants if the country isn’t worth being in

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There's not any countries as fucked as the states, don't worry

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

For the most part it has clean water, proper sewage, stable electricity, and is relatively disease free

That puts it above a fair number of options

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Most other countries are pushing to improve things though. The states currently seems (from an outsider perspective) actively regressive, currently.

Also the fact you say "for the most part", speaks volumes.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

Canada is trying to adopt American healthcare

Slovakia just elected a president because he’s pro-Russia

Brexit

France wants to raise retirement

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Also trips over himself every opportunity trying to advocate "peace deals" with Putin despite the absolute certainty that Russia would continue to attack Ukraine in the future just like they did after Crimea.

He's gotten so used to substituting confidence for actual knowledge/insight that he has had to seek refuge amongst gullible right-wing idiots and a moat of blue checkmarks in order to present the image of an audience that takes him seriously and doesn't constantly dunk on all the stupid shit he says.

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

He's essentially Joe Rogan but richer. Rogan will have every liar and peddler of misinformation on his platform, let's them spew lies while he goes "makes sense" or "I never thought of it that way" and legitimizes the bullshit. Musk and Rogan are cut from the same cloth

[–] ringwraithfish@startrek.website 24 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That fucker can go back to his own country!

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

He spent so much to buy this one, though.

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

His daily hormone therapy/ketamine/cocaine cocktail have fucked up his little racist brain beyond repair

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Can a person overdose on ketamine?

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yes, it’s definitely possible.

How Dangerous Is a Ketamine Overdose?

Taking a sizeable amount or consuming any amount from a strong batch of ketamine could lead to an overdose. According to the Alcohol and Drug Foundation3, the risk of death from ketamine alone is not high. However, a toxic amount of ketamine can still cause health problems. Most ketamine-related problems are due to mixing ketamine with other drugs, such as alcohol, GHB, and MDMA. People who have done this report symptoms like experiencing an altered consciousness, dizziness, stomach pain, increased heart rate, high blood pressure, and even urinary tract issues. People who have existing cardiac conditions or hypertension are at greater risk when consuming too much ketamine. The reason for this is that ketamine increases cardiac output, raises blood pressure, and can cause your heart to race. If you are already struggling with an existing cardiac or heart condition, it is best to avoid consuming ketamine or other mind-altering substances. When overdoses do occur, it’s typically when ketamine levels are too high in the bloodstream. If the body cannot safely break down the toxins, it will start to shut down. This could lead to a dangerous reaction, and it could even be fatal if there isn’t immediate medical intervention. We aren’t completely sure what could lead to a toxic buildup or overdose of ketamine. Factors, as we mentioned before, vary from person to person. Toxic buildup can occur because of the body’s inability to break down the ketamine due to an individual’s body mass, age, underlying medical or mental health conditions, and other genetic factors that could play a role. As mentioned earlier, those who have cardiac or heart issues should stay away from ketamine since complications can occur. The way ketamine is ingested can also increase the odds of an overdose. Snorting a copious amount of ketamine can send the substance into the bloodstream faster and raise the risk for an overdose. Toxicology reports from individuals who died after using ketamine for recreational purposes found that doses between 0.1 and 7 mgl/l were present in the bloodstream when they died, according to the Emerging Health Threats4 Journal5.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Fingers crossed that it happens soon

[–] jabeez@kbin.social 8 points 7 months ago

Darth Shitlord strikes again!

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 months ago

Can we bring back duels, holmgang, or whatever the fuck ya want to call it. I want to legally burry a fucken pike and axe in one of these fucken welps. I know I would win.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 7 months ago

I dunno why we don’t rescind his citizenship and deport him. Oh, right. He generates money. Fuck off, Lonnie. Fucking tryhard.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson yesterday issued a statement debunking claims of widespread voter fraud that were amplified by X owner Elon Musk on the social network formerly named Twitter.

Election officials in two other states also disputed the "extremely false" information shared by Musk.

Musk is generally a big fan of Texas, but on Tuesday he shared a post by the account "End Wokeness" that claimed, "The number of voters registering without a photo ID is SKYROCKETING in 3 key swing states: Arizona, Texas, and Pennsylvania."

Nelson's statement on the Texas government's website called the claim "totally inaccurate."

It is totally inaccurate that 1.2 million voters have registered to vote in Texas without a photo ID this year.

"And we have fewer than 35,000 registrants (out of 4.1 million registered voters in Arizona) who haven't provided documented proof of citizenship."

The original article contains 482 words, the summary contains 142 words. Saved 71%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!